The Christchurch Civic Crèche Case

News Reports Index

1996




Sunday Star Times
August 11 1996

Madness in Ellis case
Letter to the Editor
by G Waugh, Auckland

Unlike S. Lelievre (August 4), I applaud your editorial stance on the Peter Ellis case. The "madness" he asks about permeates our society.

A reasoned view of the Ellis case suggests that had the jury been exposed to the full range of evidence, progression of the children's stories from ordinary events to impossible, excruciating torture, would have been obvious.

Prosecution credibility and objectivity fell on their own swords because they ignored commonsense and reason, not because of Christianity or "standard liberal tactics".

Little children were subjected to repeated interviews over extended periods by misguided, zealous and poorly trained sex abuse counsellors, who took their belief systems to extremes to find abuse where none existed.

The children are victims of counselling abuse, not sexual abuse. Uncorroborated and imaginative "evidence" by frightened children is the very essence of past witch trials.

That police, judge and prosecution got caught up in the iatrogenic (disease caused by medical treatment) fantasies of little children and counsellor-speak, is the madness. "Christian leanings" would have served justice better.

Society in general, and the children and Ellis in particular, would benefit from Mr Lelievre channelling his religious passion to help undo the madness.