The Christchurch Civic Creche Case

News Reports

2000 Index




The Press
September 1, 2000

Child sex abuse: uncovering the danger of suggestion
by David McLoughlin


A visiting American psychologist questions the belief that therapists can recover suppressed memories of childhood sexual abuse. She caused quite a stir even before her arrival, finds David McLoughlin

Professor Beth Loftus seems an unlikely person to arouse the kind of heated passions that she does. She is softly spoken with a delightful west coast American accent, dresses unassumingly, and is friendly and chatty, and not inclined to make outrageous statements.

She does not have horns, yet she is regarded as the devil incarnate by many counsellors and therapists in New Zealand and overseas who work with the victims of sexual abuse.

Before she even arrived in New Zealand, she was attacked. Several members of the Psychological Society sought revocation of her invitation to deliver a keynote speech to the society's conference in Hamilton last weekend.

One of them, Dr John Read, of Auckland University, resigned from the society's executive in protest when the conference's organisers stood firmly in favour of Professor Loftus speaking.

As conference delegates filed into the Waikato University lecture theatre, two women handed out 28-page statements denouncing her. "We're here to present some balance," said one of the women, Auckland therapist Eileen Swan.

Although Professor Loftus has faced such protests for years now, she still expresses surprise at them.

All she is doing, she says, is publishing research which questions the belief that people who are sexually abused when very young can completely suppress all memories of that abuse until therapists "recover" them in adulthood.

The protests began in 1993 with her first paper on the subject, which she wrote after becoming intrigued at a rash of cases in the United States of parents facing criminal charges or being sued by their adult children after therapists had "recovered" their memories of sexual abuse from years before.

Her article questioned whether such memories were genuine, or planted as a result of the therapy.

"It was a balanced article, just raising some questions, and yet for some reason, I was labelled as having an extreme position," she says. "Ever since then, people have attributed to me ideas, comments, and deeds I have never thought and never did."

On National Radio last month, Dr Read hurled a stinging, 29-minute peroration at Professor Loftus.

"I'd much rather she stayed in America. She's doing enough damage over there. New Zealand is in a crisis over abuse," he said.

"We are trying to find some proper solutions to reduce the amount of murders of children and sexual abuse of children. To have (Professor) Loftus arrive and stir up all this nonsense that people don't repress their memories and counsellors and psychologists are planting these memories is not going to help us."

Such linking with child killings is the kind of thing people wrongly attribute to her, says Professor Loftus. Child sexual abuse is appalling, but so are false claims of abuse, she says.

Her research has looked at whether adults can have clear, detailed but nonetheless false memories about their childhood implanted in their minds by the power of suggestion. She has found that about one-quarter of adults are quite susceptible to this.

One study involved getting the subjects' mothers to reveal details about their childhoods. Those details were put to them along with a fake account of getting lost in a shopping mall.

A significant minority of people tested came up with detailed accounts of the event during several interviews.

In other studies subjects recalled details of upsetting a punch bowl at a wedding that never happened, and even recalling vicious animal attacks.

"Recently we've even got people to report that they had witnessed demonic possession by exposing them to suggestive articles and testimonials of other people," says Professor Loftus.

"So I predict there will soon be a rise in claims of demonic possession and a rise in people's attempts to get exorcisms because the movie The Exorcist is being re-released in the States next month.

"When it was first released in 1973, many people started vomiting, believing they were possessed, exhibiting the symptoms, and requesting exorcisms in massive numbers."

Many Americans also genuinely believe they have been abducted by aliens, she says, and through therapy and support groups they reveal great details of what they claim happened. However, falsely believing that one is possessed or has gone for a ride in a spaceship is harmless compared with the horrendous damage being done by therapists specialising in the recovered memories of sexual abuse, she says.

"The problem is the therapist who has only one hypothesis. It isn't the case that every bit of pelvic pain means you were abused, that every case of depression or low self-esteem means you were abused, yet those therapists are not open to entertain another hypothesis other than their sexual-abuse agenda.

"Another problem comes from people who read the many books available on the subject, and decide they have symptoms of being abused," she says.

"They go to a therapist to try to get the memories dredged up, and if the therapist says `sorry I don't do that' or `let's consider some alternative hypotheses', then some of these patients walk out the door, and they can right away find another one who will."

Her opponents say she should not speak about false child-abuse claims because that causes even more trauma for genuine abuse victims who fear they might not be believed. Isn't that a valid point?

"For people who have legitimate claims, for the people who were abused and maybe didn't talk about it for a long time, and finally now want to stand up and speak about it, maybe ask that someone be held accountable, if they have a genuine case, you would like them to be believed.

"But the cases I've seen are generally cases that are extremely suspicious.

"They involve accusations of prolonged massive abuse. They involve claims of massive repression, highly suggestive psychotherapy, which leads a person from going to having no awareness of this having happened to making detailed claims of animal sacrifice, baby breeding, baby sacrifice, and satanic abuse.

"I think those claims have to be questioned. To uncritically accept them, embrace them, and do the things people are doing to dig them out is harming lots and lots of people."

There are many people working with genuine victims of child abuse, says Professor Loftus, and she welcomes that.

The problem of false claims of abuse, however, also needs to be addressed, and she is making that her mission.

"I think that people need to recognise we're not claiming all cases are wrong by any means. Just some of them are. If we can identify the ones we ought to be suspicious about and not prosecute innocent people, the world is better off." --Dominion

Caption: While there may be many genuine cases of child sexual abuse, false claims also need to be addressed, says Professor Beth Loftus.