“NEW ZEALAND GP”
31 October, 2001.
Page 29.
Books
MODERN-DAY WITCH-HUNTERS
A City Possessed: The Christchurch
Civic Creche Case.
Lynley Hood.
Longacre. $59.95
- Reviewed by Dr Jim Hefford
Anyone reading this book would have to
agree there remains no further need for any new examination of the Peter Ellis
case. Hood, a scientist, has done it for them - exhaustively over seven years -
with the result compressed into these 600 pages.
Her book is a devastating Indictment
of the virtual reality rituals of the courtroom, and of significant sections of
the counsellors and doctors Involved In the sexual abuse field.
Hood describes herself as 'a
58-year-old, heterosexual, politically liberal atheist' who regards diversity
as 'the spice of life'. She has an MSc in physiology, three children, and has
been married to the same man for more than 30 years.
I first met her when she visited my
wife while researching Sylvia!, her biography of Sylvia Ashton Warner.
In her later book, Who Is Sylvia? The Diary of a Biography, Hood records
that she told the dying Sylvia that ‘when I write the story of your life I'm
going to get it right'. Most who knew the innovative educationalist and author
(who was certainly different things to different people) would agree Hood got
it pretty right.
The same ambition drove Hood as she
delved into the Christchurch Civic Creche case.
What is more interesting than any
discussion of Ellis's guilt or innocence is the background and motives of those
involved and the way this case fits the pattern of other witch-hunts of
history.
Ellis was a flamboyant homosexual
with a wicked sense of fun. Despite his conviction, he seems to have retained
his ability to make jokes. In 1994, after years in prison, he was visited by his
lawyers who delivered the result of the Appeal Court ruling on the Queen versus
Peter Hugh McGregor Ellis. 'Which one am I?'
asked Ellis.
Thousands of women were burnt at the
stake in the witch-hunts of the 16th and 17th centuries. They were guided by
such doctrine as the infamous Malleus Maleficarum (penned by two
Inquisitors in 1486) which pronounced, among other things: 'All witchcraft is
caused by carnal lust which is in women insatiable.’1 Hood calls
these witch-hunts stereotyping by gender and compares them to the radical cry
of the 1980s that 'all men are rapists'.
In the witch-hunt years, the laws of
evidence were changed so that completely unsupported hearsay - however obtained
- was acceptable in court.
In our own time, New Zealand has gone
further: unsupported evidence extracted from young children after repeated
'counselling' sessions is acceptable and it seems courts can be instructed to
ignore repeated attempts by children to retract their stories. The Christchurch
jury was not allowed to learn of the fantastic and bizarre flights of
imagination provided by the children to please the social workers.
Three converging movements fuelled
the sexual abuse witch-hunt: the upsurge of conservative religion, radical
feminism and the growth of the counselling and sexual abuse industries.
In the Christchurch case, families,
whether complainants or not, were offered $10,000 in ACC lump sum payments, and
40 families took advantage of the offer. Sexual abuse counselling was available
at $50 a session, paid by ACC; 2700 sessions were claimed.
Hood's judgment is that the Ellis
trial was a dual event. At one level it was a formal determination of the
accused's guilt, at another 'a community purification ritual brought into being
by years of city-wide anxiety over allegations of rampant sexual abuse,
clandestine pornography rings and Satanic cults'.
No matter how those at the centre of
the proceedings - the judge, the jury and the prosecutors - played their parts,
'the drama would end as it had to end in the ceremonial scapegoating of Peter
Ellis'. When it was all over, the leader of the police team expressed his
satisfaction on Holmes: 'God Is not mocked.'
Recently, I attended a talk by Hood
at the School of Psychology at Victoria University. The lawyers present
discussed the scandalous inadequacies of the Appeal Court and review systems.
Judges are appointed for life and there is no peer review or quality assurance.
And, it seems, it would cost the government millions if a significant number of
judgments were overturned.
Hood wondered if the process of
reform might start by setting up something like the South African Truth and
Reconciliation Commission at which the falsely convicted might present their
case and, if it were justified, obtain acknowledgement and perhaps apology but
not financial compensation.
1. Kramer H, Sprenger J. Malleus
Maleficarum, First published 1496, now available (translated) as a paperback
and throughout the Internet
- Reviewed by Dr Jim Hefford
Graphic: Author Lynley Hood holds
the product of seven years research.