The Press
July 24 2003
Publisher to expose children's testimony
by Jarrod Booker
Publisher
Barry Colman plans to publicly expose controversial children's testimony from
the Christchurch Civic Creche sex abuse case.
Mr Colman said yesterday he planned to publish transcripts of the testimonies,
which he obtained as a result of publicity surrounding a $100,000 reward for
fresh information on the case, in full page advertisements in national Sunday
newspapers on August 3.
The transcripts would reveal testimony taken from the children at the creche
and never given to the jury that convicted creche worker Peter Ellis to a
10-year prison sentence in 1993, Mr Colman claimed.
Ellis served 6½ years of his sentence and was released in 2000.
Mr Colman would not say how he obtained the transcripts, but said there had
been no claim for the reward.
"The children's testimony will expose how pathetic, flimsy, and one-sided
the evidence against Ellis was, and how the information was obtained by those
questioning the children," Mr Colman said.
"The public will be able to judge for the first time for themselves the quality of the testimony."
While the names of the children had been suppressed during the trial the
transcript evidence had not been, Mr Colman said.
"One of the transcripts we will be publishing will be that of the child
who helped trigger all the claims that ritual satanic abuse had been practised
at the
"After the public have had a chance to see this withheld testimony for themselves I'm sure there will be fresh calls for a royal
commission of inquiry into the Peter Ellis affair."
The $100,000 reward for information was offered by Mr Colman after Justice
Minister Phil Goff announced he would need new evidence before he would
consider a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the case.
The deadline to claim the $100,000 for providing fresh evidence leading to a
royal inquiry ends today.
The pledge resulted in more than a dozen calls from the public with information
but follow-up investigations failed to prove the more sensational claims that
were provided.
"I now intend to put some of the money into a fighting fund which will help
finance the publishing of the children's evidence," Mr Colman said.
Mr Goff did not want to comment on Mr Colman's plans yesterday, but a spokesman
for him reiterated there was a "proper process for criminal convictions to
be reconsidered" should new evidence come to light.
Ellis also chose not to comment on Mr Colman's plans when contacted yesterday.