Otago Daily Times
August 4 2003

More Ellis details to follow advertisement
by Joanna Norris


Businessman and Dunedin hotel owner Barry Colman, who paid more than $20,000 to publish transcripts relating to the Peter Ellis creche case, plans to publish more details on a website this week.

Mr Colman placed an advertisement, which ran in the Sunday Star Times yesterday despite opposition from the Commissioner for Children and Child Youth and Family, and has vowed to continue his campaign to clear Ellis.

The newspaper reported the cost of the two full-page advertisements was $20,500.

"We did it so that people could make a judgement for themselves," Mr Colman told the Otago Daily Times yesterday.

Peter Ellis served six and a-half of a 10-year sentence after he was convicted in 1993 of child abuse at the Christchurch Civic Creche. He has always maintained his innocence.

"My motivation has been to say let's get to the bottom of this; let's find out what really happened," Mr Colman, publisher of the National Business Review, said.

The transcripts are of several interviews with three children several months apart in 1992, according to a statement published on the same page.

The children, aged 5 and 6, describe alleged abuse by creche workers in response to questions by interviewers. The answers given by the same child on different interview occasions differs.

Mr Colman said he had hundreds of pages of transcripts which he planned to publish on a website by the end of the week.

"We were only able to give a sample in the paper. I've had queries about what else is there and how selective were we, so I'm keen that the whole exercise becomes transparent."

Mr Colman said he believed Ellis' original defence team was "cut off at the knees" because it was not able to present all the videotaped interviews as evidence.

"They weren't able to show the more ridiculous claims from the children and they weren't able to cross examine anyone on the more ridiculous claims."

Although he did not know Peter Ellis, he felt compelled to do this because he believed there had been a miscarriage of justice.

Mr Colman, who included his mobile telephone number on the advertisement, said he had not received a single call opposing the publication of the transcript.

On Saturday, the Christchurch Press published the results of a survey the newspaper had commissioned in
Christchurch. This showed 68 per cent of the 600 people surveyed felt there should be a royal commission of inquiry. The survey found 17 per cent said there should no review and 16 per cent did not know.

But Justice Minister Phil Goff last night said the Crown Law Office assured him all tapes and transcripts were made available to defence lawyers for cross-examination purposes before the jury convicted Ellis.

He said he sought an opinion from Crown Law after receiving an advance copy of the advertisement late last week, and was told it contained no new evidence.

Mr Goff said he would be happy to refer any genuinely new evidence back to the appeal judges but it was not for a minister nor newspaper publishers to determine whether people were innocent or guilty.

National list MP, Katherine Rich, of
Dunedin, who with fellow-MP Don Brash has been organising a petition calling for a royal commission into the case, last night said she supported Mr Colman's stance.

"I think what he is doing is really important because so much evidence was not put before a jury."

More than 2000 people had signed a second petition calling for the inquiry, she said.

Mr Ellis' lawyer, Judith Ablett-Kerr, could not be contacted for comment.