The |
|
The Broadcasting Standards
Authority (BSA) yesterday released a decision upholding a complaint from
Peter Ellis about an interview conducted on National Radio's Nine to Noon
programme in August 2003. Mr Ellis, a He was freed in 2000 having always
maintained his innocence. In a statement the BSA said it had
ordered Radio New RNZ was also to publish a summary
of the decision in four major metropolitan daily newspapers and pay maximum
costs of $5000 to the Crown. During the broadcast an anonymous
mother and son had been interviewed. They had made new, unspecified
allegations concerning Mr Ellis and the
Christchurch Civic Creche in 1985, which had not
been part of the court proceedings concerning the creche,
the statement said. The BSA ruled that the broadcast
seriously breached standards of fairness and balance. It noted that Mr Ellis was being anonymously accused of criminal but
unspecified offending. Mr Ellis had previously declined an
invitation to participate in a "sympathetic" interview. He had not
been made aware of the new allegations before they were broadcast. Even so
the allegations were so vague they would have been impossible to defend, the
statement said. The allegations made by the
interviewees had been neither substantiated nor critically examined by the
broadcaster. The authority noted its "deep concern at a serious
disregard for Mr Ellis's rights". |