The Christchurch Civic Creche Case


News Reports - Main Index


2005 Index 1 (Jan-Mar)

 




Otago Daily Times
March 22 2005

Hood and university dismiss criticism over doctorate
by David Loughrey

A letter questioning the doctor of literature degree awarded to writer Dr Lynley Hood has been dismissed by both the writer and the University of Otago.

A letter to the editor of the Otago Daily Times, written under a nom de plume, claimed the doctorate was not "earned", and had caused "considerable debate" in the university community.

But University of Otago research higher degrees and scholarships director Dr Charles Tustin said the procedure for awarding it was stringent.

Dr Hood, who wrote A City Possessed, about the Christchurch Civic Creche sex abuse case, said she was "outraged" by the suggestion.

Last week, Dr Hood complained to Creative New Zealand about a CD-Rom that incorrectly stated her degree was honorary.

The letter writer, who claimed to have graduated with a doctorate, said Dr Hood was not required to submit her writing to "the academic review of national and international experts in her field, nor was she required to `defend' her thesis from the rigorous examination of those same experts, to account for discrepancies or idiosyncratic interpretations, or to justify her methodology".

"Those of us who do `earn' their doctorates are required to do all of these things," the letter writer said.

Approached for comment, Dr Tustin said there were three types of degrees.

There were honorary degrees, which were not examined, and research-based degrees completed at a university, usually done by younger students under supervision.

The third type was a "higher degree", which Dr Hood received.

Higher degrees were given in science, medicine, literature, music and law.

They were awarded to people who had "quite substantial careers", and had made "quite a contribution" in their field, Dr Tustin said.

People had to apply for them, and had to have studied or been a staff member at the university.

Their work was submitted and examined by three external examiners, at least one from outside New Zealand.

It was stringent, and examiners sometimes did not pass work