Allegations of Abuse in NZ

peterellis Home / abuse allegations / Tea Ropati /

Page 2 - 1st week of the trial

Tea Ropati - League Star accused of rape
Not Guilty
”a case that should never have gone to trial” - Lawyer





 

Stuff
January 25 2008

Woman too drunk to consent, Ropati trial told
NZPA

Former Kiwis rugby league star Tea Ropati will not give evidence in his own defence, a jury has been told.

However, his wife would testify, an Auckland District Court jury was told yesterday when Ropati's lawyer made a brief opening statement.

Ropati, 43, faces trial on six charges of sexual violation – including rape – of a 36-year-old woman on June 15, 2006.

The couple met at a bar in Ponsonby. The Crown argued she was too drunk to consent to any sexual activity but the defence said she was a willing partner to any sexual activity.

The court heard yesterday the woman had a blood alcohol level nearly four times the legal driving limit.

Forensic scientist Alan Stowell told prosecutor Phil Hamlin alcohol had an anaesthetic effect, and with a level of up to 296mg, the drinker "is going to be affected to some degree", The New Zealand Herald reported today.

Dr Stowell told Ropati's lawyer, Gary Gotleib, blackouts and memory loss did not necessarily mean the person was an alcoholic and memory deficits could occur after a single binge.

Australian forensic toxicologist Olaf Drummer said the woman had consumed the equivalent of 14 to 16 standard drinks during the night, the newspaper reported.

The court also heard that Ropati had told police he and the woman had became friendly during the night and "were pretty much groping each other" in the bar.

He said the pair had later gone in his car to Victoria Park where prosecutors allege she was raped.

However, he denied having sex with the woman, and said in his statement to police he had taken her to a taxi and given her $40 for the fare home.

Mr Gotleib told the court Ropati would call scientific and character witnesses but would not give evidence himself because there was nothing he could add to what had already been submitted.