Allegations of Abuse in Institutions


Psychiatric Hospitals: Home


2006 Index

 




The Dominion Post
July 6 2006

Former patients fight court ruling

More than 150 former mental hospital patients suing for alleged abuse and mistreatment are fighting a court ruling that severely reduces the scope of their claims.

The claims, each of up to $500,000 for what happened in the 1960s and 1970s, were cut back to allegations of sex abuse, and mistreatment of informal patients before April 1972.

Associate Judge David Abbott struck out almost everything else last month because the claimants did not get a judge's permission to start the claims. The allegations included that electric shock treatment, medication and solitary confinement were used as punishment and staff assaulted them and failed to protect them from abuse by other patients. Permission was needed under a law to protect against unfounded civil and criminal cases for treatment in mental hospitals.

An earlier judgment had ruled against the agency that has assumed responsibility for the liabilities of Porirua and Lake Alice hospitals, where most of the acts are alleged to have happened. The agency had argued the claims were brought too late to be allowed to proceed, but Associate Judge David Gendall said he was not willing to strike out the claims.

Both sides are challenging parts of the associate judges' decisions.

The review hearing is due to start in the High Court at Wellington on August 30 and 31.

At a hearing yesterday, Associate Judge Gendall proposed a hearing of about six of the claims over at least 10 weeks starting in September next year.