Allegations of Abuse in Institutions


Salvation Army Homes - Main Index


Index 2006




The Timaru Herald
October 21 2006

Complainant says she was ignored by Salvation Army
'Salvationists would not believe abuse claims'
NZPA

A former resident of the Salvation Army's Bramwell Booth Home is so angry with the organisation's handling of complaints against a former manager that she will not support it in any way.

Giving evidence in the High Court at Timaru yesterday, she said children at the home learned there wasn't any point in telling anyone about how they were being abused because they weren't believed, and no one did anything to stop it.

She attended a reunion at Bramwell Booth in the 1980s and tried to tell Salvationists there about her experiences, but said she was shut down.

The first time anyone from the Salvation Army allowed her to talk fully about her experiences was at a meeting in 2003.

Former Salvation Army captain John Francis Gainsford, 69, is on trial in front of Justice Fogarty and a jury of nine women and three men on 23 indecency and rape charges.

He has pleaded guilty to a further four charges.

The charges relate to alleged offending at the home near Temuka in the early 1970s when Gainsford was manager.

"I'm very angry with the Salvation Army, and I won't support them in any way," the complainant said.

"When my husband takes me out to tea, they come around with their collections, and I struggle not to tell them my story."

Under cross-examination, the witness was told Gainsford would say he had not raped her – either in the bedroom at his home, or in a secluded area down a track near the home.

"Do you think there's any possibility that over a period of time your memory is not accurate?"

She replied that the statement she made was 100 per cent accurate.

"If it wasn't what I said it was, then what was he doing with me in those places? I don't believe he can admit his guilt, because how could he live? I believe it's his memory that's got cloudy over the years, not mine."

Evidence from Gainsford's former wife, Jill Gainsford, was read to the court.

In it, Mrs Gainsford – a retired Salvation Army major – said that just before Christmas 1974, Gainsford came home and told her he had been touching some of the children.

She couldn't remember whether he said boys or girls or both. He did not give any names, or say that he had been doing anything other than touching.

He said they had to go to Christchurch for a meeting with a Salvation Army major.

"I was thunderstruck. I can't recall what was said, but I do know she asked John if there had been any penetration, and John said definitely not."

The major asked for and was given an assurance nothing like this would happen again, and the couple were told they would be moved in January, and Gainsford would work only with adults in the future.

After that meeting, Gainsford spent little time with the children in the home. The couple's children were not told about the situation, and Mrs Gainsford did not believe it was public knowledge. She did not believe the meeting would be in any formal records.

The Gainsford family moved to Auckland in January 1975. They never returned to Temuka.

Their marriage began to break down around this time. Mrs Gainsford said she found it more difficult to trust her husband.

They spent five years in Auckland before moving to Wellington. Gainsford resigned from the Salvation Army in 1983, and despite relationship counselling, the couple separated two years later.

Gainsford phoned his former wife and their children to tell them he had been charged with the offences on which he is now appearing.

"I've known this for 30 years, and always wondered if it would come up."

Evidence from a detective who interviewed Gainsford was also read to the court. While Gainsford said he remembered some of the complainants' names, in answer to the allegations they had made against him, his response was "no comment".