Dominion Post
April 22, 2004

Police warn against lifting secrecy provisions
by Haydon Dewes

Lifting secrecy provisions on Police Complaints Authority evidence would cause long-term damage to all independent watchdogs who rely on anonymous information, the Police Association has warned.

The law and order select committee is considering an amendment to the Police Complaints Authority Act to allow the commission of inquiry into police conduct to see files covered by secrecy provisions.

The commission was set up after allegations by Louise Nicholas that she was pack-raped by Auckland police commander, Assistant Commissioner Clint Rickards, and two former officers, Bob Schollum and Brad Shipton. The men deny the allegations and say sex with Ms Nicholas was consensual.

Association president Greg O'Connor told the committee that while the commission was essential to restore public confidence in police, the amendment to the PCA act was ill-conceived and asked that it be redrafted to ensure individual secrecy was kept.

The proposed change, which was rushed through Parliament last month, would throw open thousands of files containing the evidence of witnesses previously assured that their evidence would be kept secret.

Mr O'Connor warned this had serious ramifications not just for police, but on the credibility and ability of independent watchdogs such as the Traffic Accident Investigation Commission and the Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, to operate effectively.

"Security under which people give information. . . which assures them that their information will always be private must know that guarantees of privacy can never be stripped away simply because it is convenient," he said.

To do so would be a betrayal of trust and would, in effect, build a wall of silence in the long term, he said.