Sunday Independent
January 27, 2002

Doctor faces censure for misconduct
Families demand Irish Medical Council publish report on improper findings of sexual abuse

by Fergal Bowers
Editor of The Health Website, irishhealth.com


The Irish Medical Council will meet next week to decide whether to publish a report on the biggest inquiry of its kind in this country. The case involves Dr Moira Woods, the social campaigner and former head of the Sexual Assault Treatment Unit at the
Rotunda Hospital in Dublin.

It was alleged that Dr Woods made improper findings of sexual abuse involving 11 children from five families. At the inquiry she strongly rejected the claims and allegations of professional misconduct, insisting that her actions were clinically justified and in keeping with the standards of the time.

The report of the inquiry by the council's Fitness to Practise Committee will be presented to the meeting on Tuesday. The report found her guilty of professional misconduct on a number of counts, but not all in relation to her handling of all 11 cases.

According to the report, seen by the Sunday Independent, it is alleged that Dr Woods failed to apply the standards of clinical judgement expected among medical practitioners; that these standards were prevalent and known in the mid-Eighties; that she acted in a manner not in the best interest of a number of children and that some children were unnecessarily removed from parental custody.

The council must now decide what penalty, if any, to apply and whether the report should be made public. The report recommends a penalty of censure, restrictions on her continued practice as a doctor, and restraining. It will be up to the council to decide whether this or a higher penalty should be imposed. The families involved have demanded that the report be published and that copies be given to them next week.

Last month, a number of the families held a press conference and sought a public inquiry. Last night, family representatives said they would go to the council's headquarters on Tuesday to demand that the report be made public. One of the families will be pressing the full Medical Council to impose a higher penalty than that recommended in the report. In relation to a penalty, the council can decide to censure Dr Woods, suspend her from practice or strike her off the registrar. Her lawyers are expected to attend next week's meeting to make pleas in mitigation on penalty.

She will have 21 days in which to appeal a ruling to the High Court.

The abuse allegations were initially made by social workers and two health boards are involved. Children were removed from families and taken into care but later returned. In one case, five children from one family were taken into care. The first allegations of professional misconduct were made in 1992 by parents.