Moral Panic - Child
Sexual Abuse |
|
The complainants involved in the
inquiry were most disappointed at Dr Woods's decision
not to appeal the findings and recommendations imposed on her by the Fitness
to Practise Committee of the Medical Council. An appeal would have ensured a
re-hearing of the particular cases in the High Court - and, more importantly,
in public, exactly as the complainants and the Medical Council wanted in the
first place. While we note Ms Geraghty's concern for Dr Woods and her family having to
live with the inquiry for 10 years, we also note the lack of concern or
compassion for those who were wrongly accused. Ms Geraghty
implies that Dr Woods was not found guilty of false accusations of child
sexual abuse, but of procedural lapses on a minority of points. The Fitness
to Practise Committee, by a majority, thought otherwise in a number of cases. Ms Geraghty
also says Dr Woods is a well qualified doctor who could have made a lot of
money quietly from private patients. While Dr Woods was a qualified doctor,
her qualifications in the area of investigating and validation of alleged
cases of child sexual abuse left a lot to be desired. And money was not a
problem or priority for Dr Woods. Ms Geraghty
asks if all those who were involved in the cases considered in the inquiry
are now open to the possibility of an investigation into their work, followed
by media publicity. The answer to Ms Geraghty's
question is a resounding yes. |