Allegations of abuse by NZ Police

peterellis Home / police allegations / Rickards, Shipton, Schollum vs Jane Doe

Page 2 - 2007 Trial of Rickards, Shipton, Schollum Week 2

 





Stuff
February 28 2007; 14:00

Jury out in historic sex offence case
NZPA

 

 

THE ACCUSED: (From left) Suspended assistant police commissioner Clint Rickards and former policemen Bob Schollum and Brad Shipton.

 

 

The jury in the trial of suspended assistant police commissioner Clint Rickards and former policemen Brad Shipton and Bob Schollum has retired to consider its verdicts.

Rickards, 46, Shipton, 48, and Schollum, 54, have pleaded not guilty in the High Court at Auckland to kidnapping and indecently assaulting a then 16-year-old girl between November 1983 and August 1984.

Justice Judith Potter told the jury of eight men and four women this morning that what other people may have said outside the courtroom about the trial was "utterly irrelevant".

In front of a public gallery packed to standing room only Justice Potter told the jury to consider each charge separately and the case of each accused separately.

She said they had to be satisfied that the complainant had correctly identified each of the men, and that they had each participated in the alleged incident.

Justice Potter said the jury had to consider "whether you can be sure the woman is telling the truth on the critical issues".

The charges carry maximum jail terms of seven years for indecent assault and 14 years for kidnapping.

After the jury retired, Rickards' lawyer John Haigh QC asked the judge to recall them to instruct them on a key aspect of Rickards' defence which was that at the time of the alleged incident he had been a uniformed police officer. Justice Potter did so.

In her evidence the woman said she never saw Rickards in a uniform.

As the men left the courtroom, Shipton hugged his wife in the public gallery while Schollum's wife held her husband's hands and whispered in his ear.

Earlier, Schollum's lawyer, Paul Mabey QC, in his closing statements distanced his client from Mrs Shipton whose evidence was challenged in court yesterday.

Mr Mabey said Mrs Shipton was not a witness for Schollum and if she had lied she was "a very silly lady", but if she had lied it in no way proved the guilt of either man.