The Christchurch Civic Crèche Case

News Reports Index

1992



The Press
September 5 1992

Challenge possible – union

The City Manager, Mr John Gray, may face a legal challenge to his decision to accept the abrupt closing on Thursday of the Civic Child Care Centre.

Staff and parents opposed to the decision are angry that Mr Gray declined to raise a formal objection to the Ministry of Education's decision to revoke the centre's licence, as he was legally entitled to do.

The staff union, the Local Government Officers' Union, said last night that it would consider taking personal grievance claims against Mr Gray if the closing could not be reversed.

Until it contacted the council, the ministry had proposed only to suspend the licence. Told of the proposed suspension, Mr Gray said he intended to make no "representations" on the matter. Therefore the ministry had taken the next step and revoked the licence.

Mr Gray confirmed that he supported the decision to close the centre. He said that concerns held for children's welfare and safety were such that he had no choice.

The chairman of the centre's management committee, Mr Simon Fraser, said Mr Gray had arguably not exercised a legal "duty of care" as the employer.

A former employee of the centre has been charged with sexual offences against children at the centre. Mr Fraser said so far police had made more than 100 evidential interviews relating to: their inquiry. He had learned the police feared that disclosing details of their inquiry before the matter went to court would jeopardise their case.

In light of this, the police, the council, and the ministry had agreed to withhold further details.

The centre had been running at a loss for the last six months as children were pulled out because of the child-abuse controversy, he said.

Police confirmed yesterday that the briefing given to the ministry before it took its decision concerned its ongoing inquiry into alleged child abuse at the centre. However, the police denied recommending that it be closed.

Mr Fraser said the welfare of children was paramount, but a suspension would have sufficed. Instead, staff had-been faced with a fait accompli and had no idea of the underlying reasons.

At a meeting of concerned parents and staff, last night, parents related the conflicting accounts they had been given by the police and other officials. One parent said the decision was taken in the knowledge that the forthcoming court case would attract publicity and put pressure on families.

Calling for calm, Mr Fraser said speculation was no basis on which to make a case.

He said .that with political support on the council for reopening the centre diminishing, and the possibility that new owners might be prevented from taking on existing staff, the prospects were not good.