The Christchurch Civic Creche Case


News Reports - Home


1997 Index

 






Letter to the Editor

NZ Herald

17 November 1997

 

Credibility

 

Intimate knowledge of scientific research techniques and the stern code of neutrality are hallmarks of true professionals.     By declaring its support (Nov 15) for John Read's findings about a link between sexual abuse and psychotic disorders, Doctors for Sexual Abuse Care (DSAC) has again overstepped the boundaries of professionalism.

 

At issue was, and still is, the credibility of Read's findings. While it suits DSAC's feminist agenda to give him bold and foolish support, it is unhelpful to patients, science or public confidence.

 

DSAC has seemingly allowed its bankrupt ideological obsession with sexual abuse to repress its professionalism.    Perhaps a dose of the counselling it advocates would allow it to recover memories of long-forgotten professional disciplines.  

 

The public is entitled to be sceptical of any new theories about sexual abuse.    All we ask is that genuine evidence be provided. Simply put, show credible evidence or stop prattling.

 

It is high time the Medical Council put DSAC under its microscope and Auckland University demanded John Read's adherence to the principles of science.

 

G. Waugh

Whenuapai