The Christchurch Civic Creche Case


News Reports - Home


1998 Index

 





Otago Daily Times
March 14 1998

Decision expected on Ellis parole next week
NZPA


Christchurch: Convicted sex abuser Peter Ellis will know next week if he will be released on parole after serving nearly half of a 10-year sentence.

Ellis was called before a parole board hearing on Thursday at Christchurch's Paparua Prison but refused to appear, saying he would not accept freedom if it implied he were guilty.

Ellis was sentenced in 1993 to 10 years' jail after being found guilty of sexually abusing children at the Christchurch Civic Creche between 1986 and 1992.

Thursday was the first time he was eligible for a parole hearing.

The hearing continued without him after the board was advised via letter of his decision not to appear.

His lawyer, Judith Ablett-Kerr, QC, said on Thursday Ellis had maintained his innocence since he was first accused.

"Any release at this stage would inevitably mean a release on parole subject to certain conditions. Such a release is not compatible with his fight to have his convictions overturned.

"He continues to maintain his innocence and, while he is most anxious to regain his freedom and to return to his family and friends, he cannot accept that freedom if it is granted on the basis that he is a guilty man."

Lesley Ellis, his mother, said Ellis had consistently refused to take courses and counselling offered in prison because a large component involved addressing the offending - and he was innocent.

The parole board was bound by law to consider the cases of inmates eligible for parole who wished to appear before it.

It would reconsider each case at least once every 12 months.

Although Ellis had not appeared before the board, his release would still be considered and a decision would be made next week.

Department of Corrections communications adviser Tony Wallace said yesterday that Ellis' decision not to appear would not necessarily count against him.

"We are required to consider any offender's parole when they are due for parole. The fact that he chooses not to appear still means the case is considered. If someone chooses not to appear, well, that is their decision."

Parole boards examine several factors when a prisoner is due to be considered for parole.

"They look at a person's ability to reintegrate, how they have progressed on their programmes, their likelihood of reoffending, and also submissions from interested parties, such as victims, lawyers, etc," Mr Wallace said.

He refused to comment on whether Ellis' refusal to take part in courses at the prison would affect the decision.

He said there was no set time for notifying a prisoner whether they were freed on parole.

Parole conditions would be set case by case - "Some are more of an imposition on offenders than on others".

Conditions could include having to attend rehabilitation courses.