The
Christchurch Civic Creche Case |
|
|
|
Supporters of Peter
Ellis have poured scorn on a police review clearing a former detective who
propositioned the mother of an alleged victim. The review
followed revelations last year that a key detective on the The police
review conducted by Detective Superintendent Jim Millar cleared Mr Eade,
saying his judgment was not impaired in any significant way. "I
believe Eade was not psychologically incompetent enough to consider that he
should be removed from that inquiry or would have been liable to make errors
of judgment," Mr Millar wrote. Winston
Weallans, a spokesman for a group supporting Ellis, said the review was
"hilarious". He found it
"astounding" that a detective who got drunk and then propositioned
the distressed mother of an alleged victim could be seen as not impaired. "We would
like to know what psychology qualifications Detective Superintendent Millar
has got to enable him to make this finding," he said. Supporters had
wanted an outside investigation and believed the "cover-up" was
continuing. Ellis' mother,
Lesley, said the report was entirely predictable. "Anybody who
investigates themselves will stick up for themselves," she said. "So his
(Detective Eade's) behaviour may not have affected the investigation but you
still have to look at the whole. This is just one of the little pieces,"
she said. Ellis has
started the sixth of a 10-year jail sentence for abusing children at the
Christchurch Civic Childcare Centre. He has maintained his innocence and his lawyer, Judith Ablett-Kerr QC
is soon to apply to the governor-general for a commission of inquiry into the
case. |