The Christchurch Civic Creche Case

News Reports Index

1999 July-Dec



Sunday Star Times
August 1 1999

Sex slurs forcing men out of teaching
by Mark Henderson

The Education Review Office warns boys are underachieving in class and a lack of male role models has been blamed. Are sexual abuse safeguards harming children and damaging men's role as caregivers?


John Edgar is busy writing a book on how to educate gifted children.

Two years ago, he was an enthusiastic teacher, acknowledged by colleagues as having exceptional talent.

That was until seven young boys swore the teacher had touched, rubbed and stared at their genitals in changing rooms and the playground.

Although a dozen adults, including duty teachers, said it could not have happened, Hamilton police pressed charges.

Six months and a jury trial later, Edgar was acquitted. But his 12-year teaching career was finished. In an outburst outside court, Edgar warned men not to take up teaching.

He remains bitter and disillusioned with a system he claims presumes guilt.

"It's terribly easy today for a male to be accused of sexual abuse. Children can make a complaint to deflect attention from their wrongdoing or to get back at you. Teachers live in fear, wondering when it is going to happen to them."

Some of the stories in his case, says Edgar, were ridiculous. One child recounted the teacher carrying him across the crowded playground and indecently assaulting him while trying to put the youngster in a microwave oven.

Motivation, says Edgar, was part malice, part fantasy. "Children don't realise the tragic consequences of what they are doing."

Police investigators assumed guilt because he is gay, charges Edgar.

"Teaching is doubly hard for gay men. Some people still think all gay men are paedophiles."

Hamilton police stand by the decision to prosecute Edgar and say they would take the same action if it happened again tomorrow.

Former detective chief inspector Rex Miller said the decision to charge Edgar was not automatic. "Police are not homophobic. We conducted extensive interviews with children, parents, and teachers to match allegations with time and place."

Police have been accused of taking the easy option in sexual allegation cases, preferring to let the courts decide guilt, rather than risk accusations of not been thorough in their investigations.

But Detective Sergeant Mark Churches, head of the Auckland Central District child abuse team, says that's a myth.

"We take particular care with sexual offendings and have to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt."

He concedes there have been recent cases which, when examined in a courtroom setting, did not look strong.

"You can pick holes in anything once you dissect it in court. Some prosecutions might seem borderline in retrospect. But it's wrong to say police throw people before the court willy-nilly. We scrutinise everything."

Tom Barnes (not his real name) exists on reduced superannuation -- little more than the dole -- and does voluntary work teaching English to immigrants.

His life collapsed the day he was charged with groping a young female pupil. Police pressed the case even though none of the other 30 students in class could recall the teacher acting improperly.

"I pumped myself full of Prozac to cope," he recalls. "It was terrifying.

"The drugs made me paranoid. I had a psychotic fear of being labelled a child molester."

A father of two adult children, Barnes had been teaching for 30 years.

It took less than a morning for the judge to throw out the case, noting it was inconceivable that no-one else would have noticed anything inappropriate.

"I thought I'd go back to stuff it up their noses -- the police and board of trustees," says Barnes. "But walking down the street I would get these nice, embarrassed smiles from people.

"It hit me I could never relax around children again. There's some paranoid and twisted parents out there. And what board of trustees would risk hiring me now?"

These cases highlight male teachers' fear of being wrongly accused of sexual abuse.

But police are unapologetic. They know the dangers. "There is the potential for paedophiles to use an occupation to gain free access to children," says Churches.

Yet while there have been horrific cases of youngsters' trust being betrayed by sexual predators, there is a growing voice that says society is in the grip of a moral panic.

High-profile sexual abuse cases send the message all men are suspect; they cannot be trusted with young children.

Early childhood educators have clamoured to define "appropriate" behaviour following major prosecutions such as the Christchurch Civic Childcare Centre.

Thirteen staff were sacked in 1992 after sexual abuse allegations. Only one, Peter Ellis, was convicted and sentenced to 10 years' jail. He continues to protest his innocence.

The Christchurch City Council was ordered to pay $1m in compensation for unjustified dismissal to the other accused workers, reduced to $172,978 on appeal.

Hysteria, say concerned observers, is being fuelled by good intention -- to protect our youngsters from deviants.

But the net, they claim, is being thrown too wide. Too many innocents are being accused.

Increasingly, they say, men are afraid to show intimacy to youngsters. Perfectly natural responses are being interrupted and distorted.

Concern is mounting that overzealous prevention policies are not only turning talented males away from the childcare and teaching professions, but actually harming children in their formative years.

Primary teachers' union the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Code of Practice stipulates no touching of students and not to be alone with a pupil.

"It's a bit hard on teachers -- especially when little kids throw themselves at you -- but that's the world we are living in," says Pamela Hill, regional secretary, Northern Region of the NZEI. "Children, and adults, must be protected."

Secondary school teachers abide by similar rules enshrined in the Post Primary Teachers' Association's Code of Ethics. They must not, for example, enter a room where students are dressing, or invade a student's personal space by leaning over them too closely at a desk.

"We stress `don't put yourself in any situation that could put you at risk'," says PPTA adviser Bronwyn Cross.

Several leading educators argue youngsters are becoming more distrustful of men as they are submitted to a variety of "inappropriate sexual abuse curricula".

The Auckland District Men's Network for teachers was formed last year -- prompted by the John Edgar case -- to thrash out how male teachers should relate to boys in class.

"We dare not give comfort and emotional support like we used to," says acting spokesman Garth Houltham. "Teachers today have to be stand-offish. It's a sad, negative environment. But we won't leave ourselves in a position to be accused."

Richard Johnson, from the Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies faculty at Hawaii University, has written a book on the subject. Hands Off!: Disappearance of Touch in the Care of Young Children argues "no-touch" policies in schools have seeped into everyday life.

"Society is scared to trust men," he says. "We are changing classroom policy on the basis of untruths. Research shows sexual abuse is most likely to occur outside childcare centres, away from staff."

The early education expert recalls he began as an enthusiastic young pre-school teacher in the early 1980s, but felt increasingly uneasy.

He began to second-guess himself about once taken-for-granted routines like changing nappies, wiping runny noses and unbuttoning and buttoning a two-year-old's jeans.

He worried when supervising a group of three year old girls involved in outdoor sprinkler play, clothed only in their underpants.

Today this fear of a sexual abuse complaint exists in New Zealand kindergartens and primary schools.

Training colleges, child centres and schools stress no-touch policies are for the protection of all staff, but male teachers say they are primarily aimed at them.

Hugging is forbidden at childcare centres. Men are taught the "proper" way to hold a child -- side-saddle on one knee, never between the legs -- and always to have at least one adult witness when supervising a child.

Some pre-school centres admit privately they won't hire men. "Why take the risk?" says one owner. "There's a stigma of a man wanting to work with young children," says another.

Centres worry what parents will think if there is a male on staff. "It's bad for business."

The slide in the number of male teachers at New Zealand's early childhood centres, kindergartens and primary schools concerns Sarah Farquhar, a lecturer at Massey University's Department of Learning and Teaching.

"We need men for healthy child rearing."

Farquhar has done surveys on why men are under-represented at pre-school and primary school.

An alarming trend, she says, is men leaving early childhood teaching in droves, scared off by the fear of being wrongly accused of sexual abuse. In 1971, males made up 37.8% of primary teachers. That has plummeted to barely 20% (or 4787 from a total of 24,608) today. Of the 5740 primary school teacher trainees, barely 1000 are men.

New Zealand has one of the world's lowest rates of male participation in kindergarten and licensed childcare teaching -- 1%, down from 3.5% five years ago (80 males from 6278 at childcare centres and 15 males from 14,577 at kindergartens).

"Children need to see men in caring, nurturing roles, says Farquhar. "So many boys today are from single-parent families. Soon there will be no men in early education. Where are the role models for these boys?"

A teacher with 15 years' experience recalls the incident that shook his confidence and made him forever wary.

The mother of the engaging little girl under his supervision was a good friend.

One day the infant complained of "being sore down below." The family doctor raised the possibility of molestation.

"The mother told me she immediately thought of me and her husband.

"We laughed about it later when it turned out to be a urinary infection. But it struck me that thought is always there, in every mother."

He says many men today father with fear.

"I know dads who won't take a bath with their child."

Anton Wartmann, a senior teacher with the Canterbury-Westland Free Kindergarten Association says male teachers are nervous.

He is one of only eight men out of 180 teachers at the association's 62 centres.

Ten years ago, he reckons he was naive. "I thought if I got accused of anything my conscience was clear. Now I've seen how drastically an accusation can affect a teacher.

"It's traumatic for them and their family, even if there's no substance to it. You only need to be accused once."

Author Lynley Hood is putting the finishing touches to her book on what she views as the politicising of sexual abuse over the past 25 years. Earmarked for release later this year, the book focuses on the Christchurch creche case.

Men have become stereotyped as dangerous sexual predators, she says. "This issue is not whether sexual abuse happens -- of course it does -- but how widespread it is and how much is it a threat to society.

"A generation of women has been brought up to believe all men are rapists."

Some male teachers are convinced sexual abuse has been politicised to keep men out of early childhood teaching.

They cite cases of women childminders killing their charges, but say they have not heard any calls to stop females caring for babies and youngsters.

The issue has been manipulated and sensationalised, says Russell Ballantyne, from the Dunedin Kindergarten Association.

He claims an element of the women's movement in government and early childhood colleges are happy to maintain a climate of mistrust. "They believe men have no place teaching small children."

Ballantyne points to brochures for early childhood teaching courses: "They all feature women working with children, never a man."

There is bias in recruitment literature, concedes Lorraine McLeod, associate dean of early childhood education at the Auckland College of Education. But she says the low male participation also reflects the profession's meagre pay ($22,000-$37,000) and low status.

Phillip Ozanne is one of a handful of men studying early education. At 32, he is a latecomer to teaching.

"I've always wanted to teach young kids," he explains. "They have so much learning potential."

His wife is a secondary school teacher. As part of his studies, Ozanne spends eight weeks a year at kindergartens and day care centres. Most have no-touch policies.

"That's hard if a child is bawling their eyes out. But some centres let me cuddle."

Ozanne says it can get lonely being the only man among 20 women. But other teachers have been supportive. "It's the parents that need convincing."

Educators are unanimous in agreeing men are crucial for the balanced development of young children, especially boys. Yet, they say, there seem to be no initiatives to retain or attract male teachers or efforts to confront social phobias.

Farquhar says the Government must step in and stem the crisis by funding and promoting recruitment of male teachers.

Teaching colleges, she says, must also address their orientation toward females.

"This issue is urgent. It must be taken seriously. Government, unions and training providers need to get consensus or teaching will soon become women-only."

A third of boys have no father at home. Half the nearly 10,000 divorces in New Zealand last year involved children, 50% under 10 years of age.

Boys are often adrift in life, failing at school, awkward in relationships and at risk for violence, alcohol and drugs, says Steve Biddulph, author of Raising Boys. "If we get men involved with under-fathered boys, before they make trouble, we can turn their lives around."

A major rethink has begun in the US. There are grave concerns about the negative social consequences for young children of no-touch.

Researchers at the Touch Institute are studying how instinctive, caring physical contact can be reintroduced into the classroom.

But early educators in New Zealand don't expect the turnaround in attitudes to male teachers to begin at pre-school.

They say the change in public perception will start when society sees more men as primary caregivers in the home.

John Edgar is adamant he will never return to teaching. "I would feel like a figure of suspicion. My teaching style was energetic, not authoritarian. It's not healthy for kids to be taught by a cold disciplinarian."

Tom Barnes is rebuilding his life after moving back to his home town.

He insists he has not become cynical.

"Unfortunately, many teachers live in a sheltered environment. They can be naive, unaware there is a nasty, vicious world out there."