|
|
The
|
|
Yes,
she is the same mother. Joy Bander is her pen name in that book. I refer to
her as mother S3 in that article. She took her poor dear son around to
cemeteries, a masonic lodge and all kinds of other spooky places before
taking him to well-rehearsed (with her) interviews with the welfare
interviewers. One of the interviewers, Sue Sidey, realized early on that the
bizarre stuff that little boy was spouting was coming from his mother and Sue
declined to see him again. The mother went to the police to complain and Sue
was forced to interview him a couple of times more. From those interviews
came the "circle incident" nonsense that led to the arrest of three
of the creche women staff members. Sue
Sidey was unable to get the boy to state on the record the fiction about a
kid called "Andrew" being sacrificed. The mother told Sue her son
had claimed this had happened and Sue asked the kid about it several times,
prompting him with "what about Andrew?" But it seems as if that
fantasy existed only in the mother's mind as her son was quite blank in the
face of those questions. The
appalling thing is that, despite Sue Sidey realising "Joy Bander"
was the source of that kid's allegations, four of the charges on which Peter
Ellis remains convicted resulted from those maternally manufactured
allegations. The Court of Appeal didn't want to know about it or even look
at the
"smoking gun" letter of Dr Karen Zelas detailing Sue Sidey's
concerns about the claims of this child and one other whose parents also
demonstrably manufactured claims of abuse even by the standards of the "believe anything" welfare
interviewers. |
