The Christchurch Civic Crèche Case

News Reports

2001 Jan-June



The Nelson Mail
March 16, 2001

Time to move on
Editorial


The truth has proved elusive in the Peter Ellis saga. After a lengthy High Court trial, two Appeal Court proceedings, three failed bids for a pardon and a ministerial inquiry, the sex abuse case still divides the nation. Ellis remains a convicted paedophile and, like many people found guilty of heinous crimes, he maintains his innocence. Two things set him apart: the steadfastness of the campaign to clear his name and the disturbing possibility that he is a victim of mass hysteria who was convicted on unreliable evidence from children.

In 1993 Ellis was found guilty on 16 charges of molesting pre-school children at the Christchurch Civic Crèche where he worked. He received a 10-year jail sentence but the case refused to slip from the headlines. An aborted attempt to try four of his female co-workers for similar offences rang alarm bells. Questions were also raised about some of the children's evidence with concern focused on a series of bizarre allegations that appeared to have no basis in reality. These claims were kept from jury members who convicted Ellis after weighing up more plausible testimony.

Doubts about the case are focused on the techniques used to interview children and the possible contamination of evidence. If the interviews were flawed, prompting some witnesses to make up stories of ritual abuse, was it fair to convict Ellis on the basis of filtered testimony that suppressed those claims?

A ministerial inquiry, the results of which were released this week, concludes that the convictions were sound and the children's testimony could be trusted. The finding prompted the Government to turn down Ellis's latest pardon bid and seems to signal the end of his chances of ever clearing his name. In his report, Sir Thomas Eichelbaum said Ellis failed by a "distinct margin'' to prove the convictions were unsafe.

Ellis and his supporters will no doubt fight on, encouraged by the revelation today of a secret 1999 report by a senior High Court judge that expressed serious doubts about the convictions. But at some point the rest of the country needs to move on. The Ellis case has been scrutinised like no other and has fundamentally changed attitudes about the gathering of evidence from children. New Zealand's top judicial minds have considered the matter and believe justice was done. It is time to accept that while the case may not have been perfect, it has hung together for a decade under intense pressure. Children can be trusted to tell the truth. Ellis's victims should be given the chance to put their ordeal behind them.