Allegations of Sexual Abuse in NZ

Home / False Allegations /

2008 Cases





The Press
October 16 2008

Incest case
by Jo McKenzie-McLean

A High Court judge has criticised the police investigation and prosecution of an alleged historical sex case and says the accused man has a "just and reasonable" case for costs.

In a decision in the High Court in Christchurch, Justice Fogarty said he was not satisfied "there was a proper investigation and a proper evaluation of the justice of prosecuting" the man on a rape charge and an alternative count of incest.

"Overall, I think this is a case where it is just and reasonable that there be an order of a sum towards the costs of the defence," he said.

The judge said the $55,851 in defendant costs put forward by the man's lawyer was a reasonable figure, but he reserved a decision for further calculations on the final sum.

The man was acquitted in June after a jury could not agree.

The judge said aspects of the case warranted a "careful and objective" investigation of the complaint.

The judge said the complaint was made "in the immediate aftermath of a traumatic event for the complainant and her husband when they found that their son had been sexually abusing their daughter".

The complainant had been undergoing counselling before she made her statement to the police, and told the police she was making her complaint as a way of getting closure. She alleged she was raped repeatedly by her brother as a teenager up to the age of 21.

The "inherent improbability of sustained, repetitive, non-consensual intercourse through to age 21" by a brother "without a young woman being able to take steps to bring the intercourse to an end" was an important contextual factor.

Despite the alleged offending, the complainant had maintained "strong family relationships" with her brother before making her complaint, the judge said.

The fact the prosecution had laid charges of rape with incest as alternative suggested there was some "real doubt" about the strength of the case, the judge said.

The man's lawyer, Jonathon Eaton, was correct to submit that the cost of the trial was "largely cast on to the defence by the lack of investigation of the complaint by the prosecution", he said.