Allegations of Abuse in Institutions


Abuse in NZ Institutions - Main Index


Berhampore Childrens Home

 




The Dominion Post
May 7 2005

Church should face responsibilities
Editorial

Childhood can be a lonely time for disadvantaged kids, particularly those growing up without parents. Agencies which act in loco parentis take a huge responsibility on their shoulders.

Recent allegations suggest that is a responsibility Presbyterian Support Services has not borne well. Fourteen former residents of the Berhampore Children's Home – an orphanage run by the service – have told police they were sexually assaulted by the home's former head of social services, Walter Lake.

Police were persuaded by the "strong similarity in a large number of the complaints" to ready charges against Lake, who ran the home from 1959 till shortly before it closed in 1985.

But Lake, an OBE and justice of the peace, died last November aged 84, before the charges could be laid.

The Presbyterian Church's response to the allegations has been to distance itself from the agency that bears its name. The home was not under its management or control. It was run by Presbyterian Support, a separate legal entity with a "common heritage".

Presbyterian Support's response has been to refuse to deal with former residents who speak to the media or engage a lawyer.

The organisation is not liable for the alleged crimes and will not "expose itself to allegations of a cover-up by writing out cheques", spokesman Trevor Roberts says.

Mr Roberts clearly suspects the motives of those alleging abuse. "In some cases, money is clearly at stake here."

It may well be. Victims of sexual abuse are entitled to whatever recompense they can get, though no amount of money will compensate them for lost childhoods or adulthoods blighted by memories of abuse and betrayed trust. Seeking compensation does not invalidate their claims or absolve the agency of responsibility for what occurred on its watch.

In addition to doubting the motives of the claimants, Mr Roberts also appears sceptical about the claims themselves, saying the facts have not been established. He draws comfort from the fact that two, possibly three, previous police investigations into the home did not result in charges. He should attach equal weight to the latest investigation which found sufficient evidence to put before the courts.

As he has been quick to point out, establishing the truth about what happened 30 or 40 years ago is difficult, particularly when many potential witnesses are dead. But Presbyterian Support and the Presbyterian Church have a responsibility to do everything they can to assist the process. Refusing to engage with the claimants is not good enough.

Presbyterian Support should ask itself why anyone would make up such accounts and how they can be doubted when so many tally on key points.

Having apparently failed the former residents of the Berhampore orphanage when they were children, the organisation now appears to be failing them again as adults.

It should deal fairly and openly with the former residents and help them to close the door on a terrible chapter in their lives.

At the moment, it appears more concerned with its bank balance than with vulnerable young children who were placed into its care decades ago.