Allegations of Abuse in Institutions


Abuse in NZ Institutions - Main Index


St Josephs Orphanage, Upper Hutt

 




Dominion Post
August 18 2005

Rape claims 'beyond belief'

One of the men accused of sexually abusing a woman who was in Catholic care in the 1970s has said the allegation is "absolute rubbish".

The man, whose name was suppressed, gave evidence in the High Court at Wellington yesterday against his accuser.

The claimant is now 45 and has sued Wellington's Roman Catholic Archdiocese, Catholic Social Services, the Sisters of Mercy (Wellington) Trust Board, and St Joseph's Orphanage Trust Board for $550,000.

Her mother placed her and six siblings with Catholic authorities after her parents' marriage ended.

She was at St Joseph's Orphanage, Upper Hutt, for about five years, spent several months with a foster family, was a boarder at St Mary's College for three years, and then went to a foster family for about 2-1/2 years from the age of about 17. She has already told the court that by 17 she had been verbally, emotionally, physically, and sexually abused. The sexual abuse came from her grandfather, a priest, a neighbour of a foster family, and three members of families with whom she spent holidays, she said.

The man she accused, a former neighbour, said in court yesterday that the allegations were completely untrue, beyond belief and laughable.

She said she was raped after a drinking game, but he said there was no game, though he did remember her being drunk on one occasion, and she vomited on the floor at his house. Her brother took her home and the man cleaned the floor.

The rape allegation was absolute rubbish, he said.

The claimant told the court that the man's wife would sometimes invite her to visit her husband when he was in bed and the claimant would masturbate him.

The man said that never happened, and it was beyond belief that his wife would suggest such a thing.

The claimant's lawyer asked him about his fraud convictions. After answering a number of questions, he wanted to know how it was relevant to the claimant's allegations. Justice Frater had allowed it because his truthfulness was an issue.

He had not been told his convictions would be raised when he agreed to give evidence. He agreed he had been convicted, but denied committing any offences of dishonesty. He denied telling lies.

The woman who was the claimant's foster mother during the period of the alleged abuse said yesterday that the claimant never said she was being abused, or complained about Catholic Social Services or treatment at the orphanage or the Catholic schools she attended.

The case is continuing.