Allegations of Abuse in Institutions


Abuse in NZ Institutions - Main Index


St Josephs Orphanage, Upper Hutt

 




Otago Daily Times
September 6 2005

Teacher saw no abuse at school
NZPA

Wellington: A retired Upper Hutt teacher says she never saw evidence of physical or psychological abuse in children she taught at St Josephs Orphanage.

One of the former orphanage girls is suing four Catholic groups for $550,000, alleging physical, verbal, psychological and sexual abuse while in Catholic care in the 1960s and 1970s.

In the High Court at Wellington yesterday, Joan Jenkins, who taught at St Josephs school for most of the years between 1957 and 1987, said the Sisters of Mercy nuns who taught at the school were not always easy on the children and expected them to do as they were told, but she believed the nuns had high hopes for the children.

She did not remember the woman, now 45 and whose name is suppressed, who has taken the case against Wellington’s Roman Catholic Archdiocese, Catholic Social Services, the Sisters of Mercy (Wellington) Trust Board, and St Josephs Orphanage Trust Board.

Other witnesses have supported allegations of excessive discipline but their allegations are denied.

Earlier, the court heard from a former orphanage girl who went to the school about the same time as the plaintiff. The woman said she was strapped for stuttering because the nuns saw it as attention-seeking. A retired senior teaching nun, now in her 80s, said she had never seen or heard of it.

The woman said she was sent to the head nun’s office most days to get strapped, but the retired teaching nun, whose name was suppressed, said that was not true.

The retired teaching nun said she did not think she had a reputation with the pupils for having a terrible temper and being nasty. She agreed she had a strap but said she used it on very few children.

Another nun accused of injuring the plaintiff’s eardrum by repeatedly slapping her across the ear has denied it happened.

The retired teaching nun agreed with the plaintiff’s lawyer, Helen Cull QC, that she might have called a child wicked, ungrateful or selfish, but not nasty or evil, useless or pathetic.

The case resumes next Monday for its fourth week, which is expected to be its last.