www.peterellis.co.nz : seeking justice for Peter Ellis : mail to: [email protected]

Accusations of Abuse in Institutions

 

Index: Home Page Peter Ellis
Index: Accusations in Institutions


The Press
July 31, 2002

Bishop apologises to family
by Cate Brett

The Catholic Bishop of Christchurch has apologised to a family of former parishioners for failing to adequately support them after their 17-year-old son was sexually assaulted by a fellow priest.

The boy was the first known victim of Father Alan Woodcock whom Wellington police are trying to extradite from Ireland to face multiple abuse allegations relating to his 20 years as a Marist priest in New Zealand.

The mother, a practising Catholic, and her son, now 40, met Bishop John Cunneen yesterday morning to confront him over his handling of the 1979 indecent assault that left the boy deeply scarred.

At the time Bishop Cunneen was the family's parish priest in Rangiora.

The boy, whose identity is suppressed, was picked up in Cathedral Square by the then 31-year-old Woodcock and offered a ride home to Rangiora.

Instead, he was taken to the University of Canterbury chaplaincy's residence in Riccarton and indecently assaulted.

Woodcock, who succeeded in having his name -- but not his occupation -- suppressed in court, was convicted and given a suspended sentence.

The man's mother said as their parish priest the then Father John Cunneen -- whom she respected and still regarded as a family friend -- had visited once after the assault and expressed regret at what had happened.

Despite Bishop Cunneen's ongoing involvement with the family the incident was never mentioned again nor was there any follow-up with their son or offer of counselling or support for the family.

"Emotionally I think he hasn't grown since that time. He trusts nobody.

"What's hurting most of all now, is knowing this man (Woodcock) was allowed to carry on offending and ruining more lives."

She said by papering over the event and not offering counselling and support the damage to her son had been cemented.

"It's affected this family for 23 years and what has the Church done to repair the damage? Nothing."

In a recent statement to The Press Bishop Cunneen spoke of being "personally shocked by the disclosures about sex abuse hitherto unknown to me" and stated that care and healing for the victims was his " first priority".

The woman said she wanted to see these words in action.

The Press asked Bishop Cunneen to respond to a series of questions relating to his handling of the incident, including what steps he had taken to ensure the victim and his family had been supported spiritually and psychologically after the assault.

The bishop did not respond to the questions other than to say he was in discussion with the family and the religious congregation involved.

However, the woman said Bishop Cunneen had received her and her son warmly and expressed genuine regret at the lack of action at the time.

He had explained that he had passed the matter on to the Marists and believed they would have followed it up and was sorry to learn they had not.

He had not approached them since then because he had not wanted to "open old wounds".

He was organising for the Marist brothers to visit the family next week and see what help could be offered.