www.peterellis.co.nz : seeking justice for Peter Ellis : mail to: [email protected]

Accusations of Abuse in Institutions

 

Index: Home Page Peter Ellis
Index: Accusations in Institutions


The Press
December 6, 2003

Father Consedine's words
by Yvonne Martin

Jim Consedine was one of Christchurch's best-known Catholic priests, and even with the shame of sexual abuse claims, there are many who still stand by him.

`He plays peek-a-boo in the street with my toddler. He offers to mind the kids for me when I'm sick and he plays a cheeky chicken song on his guitar to make the children hoot with laughter," said a woman from Father Jim Consedine's former Lyttelton parish.

This is the real Father Consedine, she wrote to The Press, not the shamed cleric ousted from his parish of 17 years and stripped of his priestly powers for alleged sexual misconduct against women.

"I am only one of many parishioners from St Joseph's parish in Lyttelton who could tell you a personal story about this good, honourable and dedicated man," she says.

When she was at Christchurch Hospital for a cancer operation, Consedine was among the first to visit, giving her a hug and a kiss.

A month later, recovering from chemotherapy at home, he was back, with more hugs for her and her two children.

"We once gave Father Jim a thank-you card with a picture of a sunflower standing tall and high above the others in its field. He is like that sunflower. I never really understood the `tall poppy syndrome' but I do now," she says.

Depending on whom you speak to, enigmatic Consedine is either a saint persecuted for his radical, outspoken style, or a sinner who struggled to keep his hands in his cassock.

He certainly knew how to enrapture his congregation. Consedine gave a particularly resonant sermon on the issue of clergy abuse in the middle of last year, when another order's problems were exposed.

However, he refused to talk about it afterwards with The Press, saying that what he told Sumner's Star of the Sea parish was between him and it.

By then, he was already facing one complaint of inappropriate touching and comments. Another three, dating back to when he was chaplain with the Youth Christian Workers movement in the 1970s, were soon to rear again -- the most serious being sexual violation.

Like many parishioners, the Lyttelton mother-of-two struggles to reconcile the Consedine she knew with the man described in the women's complaints.

A year after his sudden departure to an Australian therapy programme, parishioners are still feeling conflicted, grief-stricken, and more than a little at sea.

The familiar, towering figure of Consedine, with his trademark shrubby eyebrows, and glasses, was not to return after his therapy ended.

The Catholic Bishop of Christchurch, John Cunneen, insisted he quit in June and banned him from preaching and public ministry, except ministering to the dying.

Consedine was last heard of speaking about justice in Hawaii and could not be contacted for this story.

Adding to the parish's grief, the Rev John Collins, the Woolston priest whose onerous workload included administering the Lyttelton and Sumner parishes, died suddenly in September, aged 60.

Until now, the reeling Catholic community has kept its feelings about Consedine within the pews.

But as the dust left by Consedine's departure has settled, his friends are beginning to speak out about his strengths and foibles.

They also question the Church's handling of the sorry affair, and whether its insistence on celibacy tips priests like Consedine over the edge and out of the dwindling priesthood.

How did Consedine go from a pugnacious priest and justice campaigner to a religious exile, shunned by the Church?

To D6 Continued from D1

As a priest, he was seen as exceptional at comforting people in sickness or turmoil, and was therefore in demand for funerals.

He was no stranger to grief himself. The loss of his beloved niece, Suzanne Consedine, who died after falling from a bluff on an Outward Bound course at Anakiwa in 1993, was a cruel blow which affected him profoundly.

Judge Mick Brown, a retired Youth Court judge in Auckland, says Consedine's empathy at his time of loss was extraordinary.

"I lost a child in a motor accident about six years ago and he was so wonderful at that time. He was exquisite," says Brown.

"He was a lovely, compassionate person and I was horrified when I heard what had happened. He was one of the better people, and he still is as far as I'm concerned."

Born and raised in Addington, the son of a railway worker, Consedine was instilled with a strong sense of social justice and an Irish Catholic heritage. All five Consedine children have been active in the peace and anti- apartheid movements. His brother Robert Consedine has long been involved in Treaty of Waitangi workshops, helping New Zealanders confront their colonial history.

Catholic priests who double as political activists are rare these days. But Consedine ranked right up there with controversial homosexual-rights campaigner Felix Donnelly as a rabble-rouser.

He had some extreme liberal views and moved easily in political, rather than church circles. In other ways, like opposing abortion, he was conservative.

Consedine quit his prison chaplaincy after 23 years last year when a policy change meant that chaplains were classed as Corrections Department staff. This would have effectively gagged him, unless he got permission from his new bosses to talk, and he walked from the job.

As parish priest, Consedine opened the presbytery's doors to the homeless, and one of his female accusers, Bonnie Quilter, is among those who landed in jail after pilfering thousands of dollars from his parish.

He also led the campaign for restorative justice, which the Government adopted as a $5 million pilot in 2000. His 1995 book, Restorative Justice: Healing the Effects of Crime is still regarded as the movement's bible and has been translated into many languages.

"His efforts to publish that book and to work with restorative-justice groups is the single most important individual contribution to the movement in New Zealand and worldwide," says Jim Boyack, lawyer and trustee of the Restorative Justice Trust.

It was all the more dizzying, then, when sexual accusations emerged against Consedine in October last year: allegations that while working with Young Christian Workers 30 years ago he pinned women against objects and rubbed aggressively against them for sexual gratification -- known as frottage; claims that he indecently touched one young woman when she was traumatised after leaving a husband who beat her, and accusations that he sexually violated another woman, whom he would visit day and night.

These historic allegations by three women have now been accepted as "credible" by the Church's own investigative body, which recommended action.

But it has been a long, lumbering process for the women concerned.

They say they confronted Consedine over his behaviour at the time. "His reaction initially was to laugh at our concerns and then to respond angrily to us," says one complainant.

Sexual allegations were first aired publicly about Consedine in June 1984.

Anonymous leaflets alleging misconduct and signed "Women in Christchurch" circulated.

Church-goers leaving Sunday Mass found the leaflets on the trestle table alongside the parish newsletters. "We were shocked and spewing," a female former parishioner recalls. "Everybody rushed to his defence. We should have believed the women."

The reaction of then-Bishop Brian Ashby was even stronger. He labelled the document as "vile" and "scurrilous" and vowed to "track down the perpetrators of this libel".

The police stepped in, sending posters to Wellington for finger- printing.

Unsurprisingly, the women complainants went underground and stayed there until they felt the church hierarchy was ready to face their claims.

By last year, the Church had introduced a protocol for dealing with abuse complaints, but the women still struggled for justice.

In February they put their case in the hands of lawyers.

At first it looked as though it would be the end of the matter when Consedine left his parish for therapy in Sydney.

But suddenly, and inexplicably, in September the complainants were belatedly informed by the Vicar- General, the Rev Monsignor Gerard O'Connor, that the Church had acted.

Two months earlier the Bishop had accepted Consedine's resignation and removed his priestly powers. "I hope this goes some way towards lessening the distress you have felt and brings about some sense of healing for you," wrote the Vicar- General. Church lawyers added in a follow-up letter that the diocese would not be paying compensation claimed by the women, and suggested they try Consedine.

Patrick McPherson, the Grant Cameron Associates lawyer acting for the women, says the process has been fraught and protracted.

A fourth complainant, invalid beneficiary Bonnie Quilter, has gone a step further. She is suing the Church for exemplary damages over how her case was handled, and an initial conference is due in February.

* * * Just how much personal responsibility Consedine accepts in all of this is unknown as he continues his stonewall of silence.

Various documents gathered by The Press reflect contradictory attitudes.

Last June, while undergoing treatment at Encompass, the programme specialising in clergy sexual disorders, Consedine invited the women to enter a restorative- justice process. They refused. For such a process to work, they figured Consedine needed to admit his guilt. Church lawyers insist that Consedine has made no admissions of guilt. "Part of the outcome hoped for from anyone attending this (Encompass) course would be that they would come to acknowledge those parts of their behaviour which are unacceptable," they wrote last month. "To date, this does not appear to be the case in respect of Jim Consedine."

However, Consedine did write a letter to the women's support person earlier acknowledging he behaved badly and seeking forgiveness.

Dated April 11, 2000, it read: "I deeply regret the hurt I caused those young women. I could give a whole range of reasons as to what happened and why it happened. This is not the place for that. I acted most inappropriately and I regret that behaviour."

Consedine may have had personal problems, but colleagues say that the Church should accept part-blame. "Jim has to answer for what he's done, but to me the root cause of the whole problem is the absurd insistence on celibacy," says long-time political activist Murray Horton.

"Jim was a highly progressive person and clergyman, but he obviously had a fatal flaw in his own personal relationships with women."

A woman who campaigned for justice alongside Consedine agreed that he struggled with celibacy.

"He was a sexual sort of joker. I wasn't sorry in many ways that he was exposed," she says.

"If only he had left the priesthood when this was first exposed and married somebody, he would have been happier. People could have let it go. But he could not give the power of the priesthood away."

Parishioner John Corcoran can relate well to the pressures Consedine was under.

He entered the seminary in the 1960s, optimistic that the Catholic Church was about to ordain married priests, but left, disappointed, eight years later.

"I didn't feel I had the kind of spiritual life that would sustain me in a celibate state. All of us made mistakes. The problem is that we are judging now in the 21st century the standards of what people said and did 10, 15, or 40 years ago," he says.

"Jim has been very unfairly dealt to by the Church, among others. He has been accused of things and not defended by the Church. Forgiveness and love are the prime concepts that Christ came on Earth to tell people and these two concepts have not been extended to Jim in recent times."

The parish was not consulted over its leader's fate, but Corcoran said he would personally welcome Consedine back with open arms. He believed many parishioners felt the same.

"He has brought to people who have become disillusioned with the Church a place where they can be. By his removal, a lot of these people are feeling grief-stricken and lost."

Even one of Consedine's accusers from the 1970s has a modicum of sympathy over his ousting.

"I don't have sympathy for him personally, but I have some sympathy for the argument that they sheltered him for so long and when it was no longer possible, they just cut him loose," she says.

"Then they can say `we're not responsible for Consedine any more'. I'm disgusted by that self-serving response."

Catholic Communications director Lyndsay Freer says the church protocol for dealing with abuse complaints was carefully followed in Consedine's case.

"Concern for the needs of those who have suffered abuse is a priority for the Church, and the diocese of Christchurch also remains concerned for Jim Consedine's welfare and continues to support him," she says.

Those who know Consedine best say that worse than the public exposure and people twittering behind their hands is the trauma of having to leave home.

"There are always groups around the world that would welcome him," says a former parishioner. "But the worst punishment for him would be leaving Christchurch -- the place he had power, the family he dearly loved, his many friends. He would hate to be in isolation."

.

FATHER CONSEDINE'S WORDS

On sex offenders:
"Most sex offenders offend against family members or trusted friends. Public predators are relatively few and far between."


On juvenile sex offenders:
"What they need is time and space, acceptance and affirmation, forgiveness and healing in a therapeutic setting, to enable them to come to terms with inappropriate and offensive behaviour.

"Like the rest of us, they have to learn how to cope with thoughts and fantasies and desires that are unacceptable when acted upon. They have to learn when certain sexual activity is okay, and when it is not."


On Canterbury's rogue prison "goon squad" or Emergency Response Unit (ERU):
"A power of malevolence, of evil, underpinned much of what happened with the ERU, where violence, intimidation, and abuse became acceptable, despite all the talk of professionalism.

"People need to recognise the spirit of the culture they work in and confront its negative aspects when appropriate."


On the state of New Zealand:
He sees the nation as "spiritually bereft" and "morally bankrupt".

"We have lost touch with the things that nourish our spirit, God, as people perceive God, and the life of Mother Earth. Instead we have created new gods of consumerism."


On accountability:
"Financiers, money-lenders, lawyers, economists, and accountants who dominate decision-making, politicians who ignore legitimate protest, bankers who charge too much interest, and even Church leaders who `fail to give flesh to their moral authority' are rarely called to account."


On the argument that churches should stay out of politics:
"You must proclaim and promote a God-given dignity that people have, so you cannot stand by and see people oppressed through poverty or slavery or anything else."