Allegations of Sexual Abuse


Police Rape Allegations - Index


16-31 March 2005

 




NZ Herald
March 17 2005

Top policeman in the dock
by David Eames and Rosaleen Macbrayne


Brad Shipton, Bob Schollum, Clinton John Rickards


An investigation lasting more than a year culminated yesterday in a court appearance by one of the country's highest ranking police officers and two former policemen

Assistant Commissioner Clinton John Rickards appeared in the Auckland District Court over allegations made by a Rotorua woman, Louise Nicholas.

The nature and number of those charges were suppressed by Judge Simon Lockhart, but they relate to historic offences, allegedly committed when Mrs Nicholas was a teenager.

Two co-accused, former policemen Robert Francis Schollum, 52, and Bradley Keith Shipton, 46, appeared in the Tauranga District Court where Judge Russell Callender also suppressed details of charges, including their number and nature.

Rickards, suspended on full pay for 14 months, entered no plea but professed his innocence through his lawyer, John Haigh, QC.

Rickards appeared for the 10-minute hearing wearing a dark suit. He remained silent and looked straight ahead while in the dock.

He would vigorously defend the charges, Mr Haigh told the court.

Rickards was remanded on bail to a pre-depositions hearing in the Rotorua District Court next month.

Regular police prosecutors did not handle Rickards' first appearance, a task given to Crown prosecutor Brent Stanaway of Christchurch.

He did not oppose the suppressions.

In Tauranga, Schollum and Shipton were remanded on bail - with residential conditions - to the Rotorua District Court on March 30.

Rickards at the time he stood down from the force was Auckland regional commander.

Since leaving the police Shipton has been a bar owner and is a former Tauranga City councillor.

Schollum became a car salesman.

Outside the Tauranga court, counsel for both men said they were concerned about whether their clients could get a fair trial anywhere in the country after publicity about Mrs Nicholas' allegations.

Paul Mabey, QC, for Schollum, said he would consider applying for a stay of prosecution.

Shipton's counsel, Bill Nabney, said his client was "obviously disappointed" to have been charged but was pleased the matters were now before the court.

He said he was "going to have to look at the issue more closely" regarding his client's ability to get a fair trial.

Both lawyers said Schollum and Shipton would continue to deny the accusations against them.

The three accused were arrested yesterday.

Detective Superintendent Nick Perry said the arrests followed investigations made by Wellington and Rotorua-based police who had worked on the case for more than a year.

Canterbury University media law expert John Burrows said the suppression orders imposed at the court appearances were unusual, because it was usually the name of the accused that was suppressed.

But Professor Burrows said any decision on suppression was made only after careful consideration.

"The judge has had everything explained to him.

"It is based on the information he has got."

The prosecution, though only at a first-appearance stage, could be the country's most expensive.

One estimate puts the cost at more than $6 million.

Police gave the first insight into the scope of what was dubbed Operation Austin in January, releasing figures showing that more than 2000 people had been quizzed here and overseas, with staff clocking up more than 32,456 hours.

The investigation, led by Dunedin-based officer Superintendent Nick Perry, started as soon as the allegations surfaced.

A Sunday newspaper said the cost of the investigation included police wages and investigation costs, and $3 million had been set aside for the commission of inquiry into the allegations.

Estimated police wages, including Mr Rickards' pay of an estimated $200,000 while on suspension, was at least $2 million.

It also stated almost $1.1 million was spent on travel and accommodation.