Allegations of Sexual Abuse


Police Rape Allegations - Index


16-31 March 2005

 




Otago Daily Times
March 17 2005

Top policeman faces charges
NZPA

Clint Rickards
March 16 2005
Photo: NZ Herald - Suspended police Assistant Commissioner Clinton Rickards leaves the Auckland District Court yesterday after being remanded on bail on unspecified charges.

 

Wellington: One of New Zealand’s highest ranking police officers and two former policemen appeared in court yesterday on unspecified charges.

Assistant Commissioner Clinton John Rickards appeared in the Auckland District Court in relation to allegations made by Rotorua woman Louise Nicholas.

The nature and number of those charges were suppressed by Judge Simon Lockhart, but they relate to historic offences, allegedly committed when Mrs Nicholas was a teenager.

Two co-accused, former policemen Robert Francis Schollum (52) and Bradley Keith Shipton (46) appeared in the Tauranga District Court.

However, all details of the charges against the two, including their number and nature, were suppressed by Judge Russell Callender.

Rickards, who has been on suspension, on full pay, for the past 14 months since the investigation started, entered no plea in relation to the allegations.

Rickards appeared for the 10-minute hearing wearing a dark suit. He remained silent throughout the hearing, looking straight ahead while in the dock.

Lawyer John Haigh QC said Rickards would vigorously defend the charges.

Rickards was remanded on bail to a pre-depositions hearing in Rotorua District Court next month

Regular police prosecutors did not handle Rickards’ first appearance. Crown prosecutor Brent Stanaway, of Christchurch, handled the prosecution.

He did not oppose the suppression orders.

Bail conditions for the men included handing over their passports, and not contacting the complainant or other Crown witnesses.

In Tauranga, Shipton was represented by Bill Nabney while Paul Mabey QC appeared on behalf of Schollum.

Outside the court, Mr Mabey said Schollum “absolutely denied” the charges relating to Louise Nicholas.

Mr Mabey said he would be considering applying for a stay of prosecution

Mr Nabney said Shipton was “obviously disappointed” to have been charged but was pleased the matters were now before the court.

He said he was “going to have to look at the issue more closely” regarding his client’s ability to get a fair trial.

Canterbury University media law expert Prof John Burrows said the suppression orders imposed at the men’s appearance were unusual, as it was usually the name of the accused that was suppressed.

However, Prof Burrows said any decision on suppression was made only after careful consideration.

“The judge has had everything explained to him. It is based on the information he has got.”

The prosecution, though only at a first-appearance stage, looks likely to be New Zealand’s most expensive, with a January estimate putting the cost at more than $6 million.

Media reports have said wages of police involved in the inquiry, including Rickards’ pay of an estimated $200,000 while on suspension, totalled at least $2 million, while almost $1.1 million had been spent on travel and accommodation. The commission of inquiry set up to consider Mrs Nicholas’ allegations had a budget of $3 million.