Child sex abuse hysteria and the Ellis case


Focus on People - Hall of Fame

 

The wisdom of Gordon Waugh - Index

 



Newsgroups: nz.general,nz.politics
January 20 2002

ACC Compensation for Sexual Abuse; Compilation of Data
by Gordon Waugh




COMPILATION OF ACC DATA
1988 to 2002
(INCLUDING SOURCE DATA)

Compiled by
Gordon Waugh,
Whenuapai



ITEM 1.

Source : New Zealand Herald, 19 August 1995

$830m lump-sum compo rush.

A rush to pick up lump-sum compensation cost ACC more than $830 million in the past few year.   Nearly 110,000 claims were paid out since the lump-sum payment was abolished in the 1992 ARCI Act an claimants with injuries prior to 1 July 1992 were allowed to register claims during a 3-year transitional period.

$151,661,123 was paid out for loss of bodily function and $681,213,727  for loss of enjoyment of life.

[Comment :   Whilst most of the former payments will relate to physical injuries such as loss of limbs, the vast majority if the latter payments will be sexual abuse "sensitive: claims, usually $10,000 each.    Where a number of different episodes and perpetrators are named, complainants have received $10,000 per incident, and there are cases where satanic ritual abuse has been alleged, and complainants have been paid $60,000 sums by ACC.    There are still over 4,000 claims to be reviewed.]

[Note it was confirmed to me by ACC in a letter dated 5 June 1996, and also in its 1995 Annual Report (page 22) that "between 1 July 1992 and 30 June 1995, ACC made 109,393 lump sum payments totalling $833M. This comprised  $152M for impairment of bodily function and $681M for loss of enjoyment of life.    The average payment was around $7,600."]




ITEM 2.

Source :  New Zealand Herald, October 1992 

Sexual abuse boosts compo claims.

Sexual abuse victims have been apply for help from the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation at the rate of up to 500 a week.

About 6000 abuse claims were lodged with the corporation in the three months to September.   This massive surge compares with a total of 2173 claims in the year to June 1991 and 1075 claims in the preceding 12 months.

The corporation attributes the increase to the September 31 cutoff date for lump sum payments, increased knowledge of payments available to victims and a growing awareness and acceptability of seeking help.

Between 10 per cent and 15 per cent of claims have been lodged by men and 98 per cent of claims are accepted.

The manager of the corporation's sensitive claims unit. Mr Simon Radford, said there was a greater number of claims than had been expected but extra staff had been brought in to cope with them.

"We have a strategy to clear the work that is to hand which has involved bringing in extra resources to cope with that.    It's not out of hand by any means."

Changes to the corporation from July 1 meant that anyone who was abused after that date could not apply for a lump sum of up to $27,000 but the corporation would pay towards the costs of counselling on a "case by case" basis.

Mr Radford said the process of considering the eligibility of most claims was straightforward and they could be approved within a month, although a counsellor's report was needed and this could delay decisions.

Most of the claims related to abuse within families and were starting to taper off to about 100 a day, down from a peak of 300 a day during some weeks.

"There has been a large number of claims because people are conscious of the fact that lump sums are going but the other thing is that many of these claims date back to abuse many years ago and I think people are starting to feel comfortable coming out and saying they have been abused."

Under the new legislation, those abused before 1974, when the compensation scheme was introduced, may now apply for help with counselling.

The date when they first saw a doctor about the abuse is deemed to be the date of the abuse.    Payments ranging from $56 to $78 an hour for counsellors are available.  -NZPA




ITEM 3.

Source  :  Sunday Star-Times, late 1992 or early 1993.   The
statistics given match those in ACC Annual Reports.

ACC pays $20m to sex abuse claimants.
(By Rob Drent)

Almost $20 million was paid out to sexual abuse claimants by the Accident Compensation Corporation in 1992.

Figures to late December show payments were made to 2173 people - making the average payout just under $10,000.The 1992 sexual abuse compensation of $19.9 million is a huge rise on previous years, when sex abuse claims were lumped in with others under a general heading of "pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life."

In this group, payouts were made in 1991 to 1075 claimants totalling $9.7 million; in 1990, $6 million to 667 claimants; 1989 $4.1 million to 445 people and 1988, $1.9 million to 221.  

[The remainder of this short item repeats some of the assumptions about why the huge increase happened.]



ITEM 4.

Source : NZ Herald, 6 April 1993

Sex abuse claims flood in

About 100 sexual abuse compensation claims are being made around the country each day, the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation says.

The corporation policy planning general manager, Lauretta Alessi, said yesterday that the claims were for various forms of abuse including sexual violation, incest and child molestation.

She said it was not known exactly why there was such a large number of claims being sent.    The daily average used to be 20.

"We think it may be because now it is more acceptable to talk about abuse and because of the cut-off dates for applying for lump sum compensation payments."

Requests for lump sum payments had to be made by March 31 this year.

[Comment ;  But government later extended the cut-off date to 30 June 1995, and even then, it kept going for a bit.]



ITEM 5.

Source : NZ Herald, 22 September 1995, Section 1, Page 5.

Sex abuse counselling costs reach $8.3m

Wellington  -  The Accident Rehabilitation and Insurance Corporation received an increased number of sexual abuse claims in the year to June and is worried about the cost of counselling.

In its annual report tabled in Parliament yesterday the corporation said it registered 11,740 sexual abuse claims in the 12 months under review compare with 10,800 in 1993-94.

"The principal entitlement being sought is payment for counselling and this has become an issue of concern to the corporation," the report said.

"Counselling costs for sensitive claims during the year totalled more than $8.3 million."

The report says the corporation found itself increasingly in the position of funding counselling and other entitlements for individuals with psychological problems which could not be identified clearly as resulting from only the sexual abuse incident which has cover under the scheme, it said.

[There were a couple more paragraphs of general material].




ITEM 6.

Source :  The Dominion, 22 January 1997

Increasing cost of sex abuse claims concerns ACC (by Frances Ross)

ACC says it has no data on the costs of compensating victims of sexual abuse, despite nearly 20,000 active claims and big concerns about the increasing amount of money spent on them.

In its annual report, ACC singles out the continued high volume of increasing costs of sexual abuse claims as a big concern.

During the year ended 30 June 1996 there were 9982 sensitive claims lodged, compared with 11,750 the previous year and 10,800 in 1993-94.

The Sensitive Claims Unit had 19,130 active claims in 1995-96, the report said.

"Last year the corporation noted with concern increasing costs in compensation for these claims, mostly in providing counselling for  claimants.   This trend has continued and erodes the cost reduction gained through the removal of lump sum compensation from the scheme."

Asked for actual costs, corporation spokesman Alan Seay said the ACC computer was not capable of identifying and costing sexual abuse claims.

"The system was set up for people who fall off ladders and that sort of thing so our codings do not cover sensitive claims," Mr Seay said. "We don't really know what it costs but we do know that it is a huge amount of money."

Mr Seay said there had been a big jump in the number of sexual abuse counsellors accredited as ACC providers over the past two or three years, with numbers rising from about 300 to 1000.

"That's the basis for our saying costs are increasing."

He said the corporation had appointed more case mangers to deal with sensitive claims, and was now classifying all such claims according to their seriousness.

"What we don't want is people being treated for two to three years for something relatively minor."    [But some claimants remain in counselling for more than ten years !!!!]

It was also implementing a new computer system that would be able to classify sensitive claims and identify the costs of compensating
claimants.





ITEM 7.

Source : NZ Herald, 10 January 1998

Minimal payout for sex abuse overturned (by James Gardiner)

A 17-year-old woman is in line for $60,000 compensation after successfully challenging an ACC ruling that more than 400 incidents of sexual abuse she suffered constituted a single injury by accident.

The AR&I corporation has been slammed by the Accident Compensation Appeal Authority for failing to consider the multiplicity of the incidents of sexual abuse.

The Authority, Peter Cartwright, described the corporation and its review officer as "artful", suggesting cunning and possibly underhand methods were used to avoid paying out more money. [Snip….]

[This was  quite a long article, but the above illustrates the point about payment on a "per incident" basis.]




ITEM 8.

Source  :  NZ Herald, 25 April 1996

Woman coerced to have sex 17 times will get up to $170,000

[As with Item 7 above, the key points only are given here.]

Wellington -  A woman who was coerced by her psychologist into having sex with him 17 times will get up to $170,000 in accident compensation.

In a landmark decision, an Accident Compensation Appeal Authority adjudicator, Mr Peter Cartwright, has allowed the woman's appeal against an ACC decision that all of the sexual abuse was a single act, entitling her to a maximum $10,000 lump-sum payout.

Mr Cartwright ruled "Each of the 17 separate incidents identified by the appellant should be treated as personal injuries by accident."

[snip….] -  NZPA




ITEM 9.

Source  :  A letter to me from ACC dated 30 January 1998.

To fill in some gaps in the statistical table, I asked ACC for current data from 1994 to 1997.    The answer was :

FY 1994/95  -  10,589 new claims.  Total cost including counselling,
$12,434,851.
FY 1995/96   -  11,858 new claims.   Total cost $11,242,426.
FY 1996/97   -  12,036 new claims.   Total cost $12,915,655.



ITEM 10.

Source : Sunday Star-Times, Sunday 13 June 1999

Title : Claims expanded

Body :

More than 60,000 people reporting psychological effects from sexual abuse have made claims to ACC since 1992.    ACC declined about 20,000. 



ITEM 11.

Source : The NZ Herald, Tuesday 15 June 1999

Title : Sex Cases
 
More people suffering the psychological effects of sexual abuse will be able to claim accident compensation from next month as the grounds for claims have been expanded.

Of the 61,219 claims lodged with the ACC since 1992 in relation to sex crimes, 40,790 received compensation.



ITEM 12.

Source  :  A letter to me from ACC dated 2 October 1998
ACC gave the following information :

In response to your further questions :

(a)        Of the $9m paid in entitlements for the year 1997/98, $2.3m was spend on Independence Allowance.   Entitlements paid depend on a claimant's circumstances, therefore it is incorrect and misleading to simply divide the number of claims by the amount paid in entitlements.

{Not if one wants to establish an average !!!]

(b)        Approximately one quarter to one-third of claims lodged are not pursued further by the claimant and are declined and others are declined through not meeting the regulated criteria.   Hence the difference between the number lodged and number accepted.




ITEM 13.

Source : Hon Bruce Cliffe, Minister of ACC, in letter MIN 6549 dated 16 June 1995.

This letter was in response to some questions I asked the Minister. He wrote that in 1992/93, the cost of claims was $43,547,000 of which $37 million was lump-sum payments.

In 1993/94, the cost was $24,130,000 including approximately $16 million spent on "the declining number of lump sum payments."



ITEM 14.

Source : NZ Herald 16 December 1995

Lump sums to cost ACC $15m more

Winding down lump-sum compensation payouts is expected to cost the ACC and extra $15 million.

A rush to pick up lump sums has already cost it more than $830 million in the three years to June 30, 1995.

A further 2387 payouts, totalling $8.1 million, have been made since the June cut-off date.   The average lump-sum payment was about $3400, less than half the average payment made before the cut off date.

A spokesman for the corporation, Mr Fred Cockram, said some claimants were seeking only to top-up payments already received, while other cases had gone in the corporation's favour.

He estimated that the corporation would cough up a further $7 million to settle about 2000 remaining claims

Almost 110,000 claims were paid out during a transitional period after the Government abolished lump-sum. Compensation in the 1992 Accident Rehabilitation and Insurance Act,

Claimants who had received injuries before the act came into effect on July 1, 1992, were allowed to register claims for lump-sum payouts during a three-year transitional period.

Although many claims were already before the ACC at the time the new act was passed, a further 63,000 were later lodged.



ITEM 15.

Source :  Manawatu Evening Standard, 1 November 2000

$16m sex abuse payout.

People suffering the psychological effects of sexual abuse cost taxpayers nearly $16 million a year.  Figures from ACC showed the sensitive claims unit paid out $15.8 million for 4,400 claims in the year to June 30. [2000]

ACC received far fewer claims last year, with 4500 compared to 8000 the year before, 

[Snip…]




ITEM 16.


Refer also to ACC Annual Reports
which are tabled in Parliament usually around September of each year.    They should be available in Libraries.  In 1995, they also put out a "review" document titled "Accident Compensation 1995".   Makes interesting reading, especially Page 26



SUMMARY

Putting all that together,  The number of new claims since 1988 looks
like :

FY     New Claims
1988     221
1989     445
1990     667
1991    1075
1992    2173
1993   13000
1994   10800
1995   11750
1996    9982  -   The lump-sum money stopped about here.   (50,113
claims)
1997    8362
1998    7236
1999    7971
2000    4400
2001    4289

Total  82,971

Over the 1993 - 1999 period, the average was 69,101 / 7 = 9,872 claims per annum.

In the same period, about 750 or so would have been convicted annually for all types of sexual crime.   That data is available from the Ministry of Justice report "Convicting and sentencing offenders in NZ" -  I have access to that and it forms a useful basis for comparison. ACC claims in this period are 13.16 times higher.

ACC Website gives figures for New & Accepted Claims, but does not appear to give data on numbers of claims declined.   This would appear to account for their lower figures from 1994/5 to 2000/1.

Alan Seay was cited as saying that ACC did not know how much these sexual abuse claims cost, but it was a huge amount.

For the reason that ACC did not properly classify claims, and did not modify its computer until around 1996, it is very difficult to accurately piece together the actual costs, so it is necessary to estimate from the various sources and sets of information.

A primary one is the $833M, which ACC paid out between 1 July 1992 and 30 June 1995. ACC made 109,393 lump sum payments totalling $833M. This comprised  $152M for impairment of bodily function and $681M for loss of enjoyment of life.    The average payment was around $7,600. It is reasonable to infer that much of the $681M was for sexual abuse claims, but problematical as to exactly how much.

Given the number of claims and the amounts advised from 1988 to 1992, in which the figures to late December 1992 show payments of $19.9M were made to 2173 people.    Earlier payouts were made in 1991 to 1075 claimants totalling $9.7 million; in 1990, $6 million to 667 claimants; 1989 $4.1 million to 445 people and 1988, $1.9 million to 221.    The total for that short period was $41.6M for 4581 claimants, the average being $9081 each.

According to Bruce Cliffe, then Minister of ACC, in 1992/93, the cost of claims was $43.5M and in 1993/94, $24.1M.

And according to ACC :
FY 1994/95   -  10,589 new claims.   Total cost including counselling, $12,434,851.
FY 1995/96   -  11,858 new claims.   Total cost $11,242,426.
FY 1996/97   -  12,036 new claims.   Total cost $12,915,655.

For 1997/98, ACC advised me of 7,236 new claims (of which they said approximately 4,419 were accepted) with payouts of $15M.

On its Website, [www.acc.org.nz]  [from "publications" select "injury statistics" and go to Section 12 Sensitive Claims] ACC gives figures for 1998/99 of 3,493 claims and $12.6M, for 1999/2000, 3,670 claims and $13.5M, and for 2000/01, 4,289 claims and $14.69M.

The total from 1988 then appears to be about $202M.

Now return to the massive $833M item and the typical averages.   For ease of assessment, let's use an average of a neat $10,000.      In the period for which lump sums were being paid, from 1988 to late in 1996, the total number of claims was 50,113.  Multiplied by $10,000 gives an assessed total of $500M.    The ACC Complaints Authority noted that ACC was "artful",  cunning and possibly underhand - and I can vouch for that through my own experience with them !     Couple that to the incredible fact that they did not know how much was being spent, and I feel that the answer is closer to $500M than $200M.

Whatever the actual amount - and no one knows exactly what it is – the payments are made on the flimsiest basis.   No proof of abuse is needed.  No report to police or criminal convictions.  The alleged perpetrator need not be named.   Counsellors do not investigate or corroborate - they believe the claimants.    And ACC believes the counsellors.   By some form of arcane magic, ACC decisions are made "on the balance of probability" that abuse occurred - with just one set of information.     In my opinion, this is the biggest swindle NZ has ever seen.

Gordon Waugh
Whenuapai