Child sex abuse
hysteria and the Ellis case |
|
I congratulate Barry Colman on his
courage to actually do something about the conviction of Peter Ellis. Despite Phil Goff's ostrich-like
stance, the call for a Royal Commission is appropriate sensible, and welcome.
At the very least level, the Commission's Terms of Reference must require it
to investigate matters surrounding the methods used by counsellors to derive
"evidence of abuse", their automatic presumption of guilt, the
reliability of such evidence, how and why it was selectively filtered, the
systemic flaws in the ACC system, and the extensive amendments and additions
to Section 23 of the Evidence Act, The Christchurch Creche case is
virtually identical to scores of others overseas. With few exceptions, those
convictions have since been quashed by appellate courts because the methods
used, and the children's evidence, were unreliable and fatally flawed. Over the past decade, those same
methods have resulted in tens of thousands of |