Child sex
abuse hysteria and the Ellis case |
|
|
|
The wisdom of
Gordon Waugh - Index |
|
ACC proposes to reduce
costs by cutting the number of helicopters it uses in rural areas. Those
machines are vital in saving the lives of accident victims, and also provide
emergency capacity when disaster strikes. But in the same breath, ACC
literally chucks taxpayer funds away in other directions. With little or no
justification, ACC spent $27 million last year on sex abuse claimants. Some
claimants get $60,000 annually. It gave the HELP Foundation a cool $200,000,
conveniently calling it funding for a "pilot study". ACC already has an
apparently perfect method for diagnosing the believed-in mental effects of
sexual abuse. Diagnosis does not require credible proof of the alleged abuse,
but magically relies on "clinical medical evidence". It is, they claim,
much like an X-ray might indicate internal damage to organs or bones! On this
miraculous basis, ACC wastes increasingly more millions. Incredibly, they let a
$600,000 contract to study the best way to diagnose mental injury resulting
from sexual abuse. Wouldn't proof of the alleged abuse, provided by the
claimant, be a good enough basis? A dash of common sense here would avoid
cutting vital helicopter services. |