Allegations of Sexual Abuse

False Allegations

John Edgar case



Waikato Times
April 28 1998

Former teacher's fate now rests with jury

A Hamilton District Court jury was today to decide if former teacher John Timothy Edgar is guilty of indecencies against boys.

Judge Lynton Laing was due to sum up the case this morning with the jury expected to retire to consider its verdicts after that.

Crown Prosecutor David Wilson, QC, and defence counsel Roger Laybourn summed up their cases yesterday.

Edgar, 38, is accused of seven counts of indecent assault and one of committing an indecent act while he was a teacher at Hukanui Primary School.

The Crown alleges Edgar touched the genitals of six boys and looked at another boy's penis.

The first complaint dates back to 1991.

All seven boys testified via closed circuit television last week.

Mr Wilson described Edgar as a "Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde", who hid his consistent offending from others at the school for years under a cloak of secrecy.

Mr Wilson said: "This comes about because people don't recognise what they see and if they do, don't tell anyone."

Mr Laybourn said the boys' allegations had fundamental flaws.

"How can you trust and rely on a witness that tells such conflicting stories?" Mr Laybourn said.

"That in itself should make you have serious doubts about his allegations."

A series of defence witnesses, mostly former colleagues of Edgar, described him as a talented teacher. They said Edgar had a reputation for professionalism and honesty and was popular with students.