Allegations of Sexual Abuse

False Allegations

John Edgar case



Waikato Times
May 2 1998

Dr Edgar's case a salutary tale

In the Hamilton District Court this week, a jury of nine women and three men found John Timothy Edgar not guilty of eight charges of indecency. It had been alleged that he had indecently assaulted children while he was a teacher at Hukanui Primary School. Dr Edgar maintained his innocence from the start as did a large band of (mainly women) supporters who sat through the court proceedings. Hukanui Primary School serves an affluent, middle-class suburb of Hamilton. Its parents have an investment in the school's reputation. Even with a not guilty verdict, the effect of the case on the community and the families of the children who alleged they had been assaulted will be felt for some time.

On his acquittal, Dr Edgar was elated but bitter. His first pronouncement, minutes after the verdicts were read out, was a warning to other male teachers or men considering teaching as a career. He said the profession was now too risky for males because it left them open to allegations that could ruin their careers -- and lives. If a male teacher touched a child in any way, it could be misconstrued or used by children as a way of seeking revenge. He said. "I hope that one day they (the children) realise what they have done was wrong and own up to it. I don't think they can be confused about what they did."

It would be unfortunate if men took his advice and steered clear of the profession. There are precious few of them already. The balance of male and female role models in schools is essential. Some men say they are already aware there are risks involved and have been put off by them. But other male teachers are relaxed. They say as long as they avoid situations that may be compromising, there is no greater risk for them than women. They are supported by schools who have good rules and guidelines about appropriate behaviour.

This country's views on children's sex allegations have shifted hugely in the past two decades. The old view in schools was to back up teachers and cover up the claims of children. The results of that practice are showing up in cases now before the courts where teachers like Lloyd Brown have been found guilty of sex charges dating back over many years.

The Peter Ellis case in 1993, however, in which a childcare worker was accused of bizarre sexual practices, sent a nervous shudder through the land. In that case, a single comment from a young boy triggered a torrent of allegations and hysteria. Ellis is in prison even though increasing numbers believe he, too, is innocent.

Child witnesses can be just as reliable as adults if handled correctly. It would be unfortunate if, as a result of concern over the Dr Edgar and Peter Ellis cases, their comments were ignored or discounted as a figment of an over-active imagination. People acting in loco parentis will sometimes take advantage of children's innocence and abuse them. Children alleging such offences must be taken seriously. If the stories are later found to be untrue, that is most unfortunate. But the alternative -- that real abusers are not identified and get away with it -- is worse.