Allegations
of Sexual Abuse |
|
A
complaint over the coverage by the Waikato Times of assault charges against a
On
February 17 this year Ross Hope and three others complained to the council
about the newspaper's coverage of the arrest and initial court appearance of
John Edgar on charges of indecently assaulting seven students at Dr
Edgar was arrested on November 12 last year and appeared in court the next
day charged with indecently assaulting an 11-year-old boy. On that occasion
his name and the name of the school where he taught were suppressed.
Notwithstanding that, the Waikato Times took a photograph of him as he left
court. Its first report, however, contained just bare details of the case and
made no reference to Dr Edgar or The
following week Dr Edgar appeared in court again, this time on seven charges
of indecent assault. Name suppression for both him and They
also complained about the way the photograph had been taken the previous
week, saying the photographer had been standing in bushes when he took the
photograph and had assured Dr Edgar it would not be used. It was also an
unflattering photograph given it was taken after the only night Dr Edgar had
spent in jail. He had been unable to shave or iron his shirt. In
response the The
editor pointed out that while the story contained comment from the The
complainants replied that the article had been so damaging that a defence
lawyer said he would request a change of venue for the trial if the
unbalanced reportage continued. The
editor said the lawyer had made his comments during a court hearing to
consider a Waikato Times request for evidence handed up during a depositions
hearing in December to be made available. She noted lawyers often resorted to
extravagant language and that the newspaper had received no complaint or
warning from the court about its coverage. Subsequent
to the complaint being laid, Dr Edgar was found not guilty on all charges of
indecent assault. The Press Council said that verdict had no influence on the
council's decision, but it did indicate the An
allegation of indecent assault against a local teacher was news. It was
hardly surprising that it received front-page coverage or that a photograph
was used. There was nothing in the story to imply Dr Edgar was guilty. The
paper was careful to refer to allegations of indecent assault. The
newspaper's coverage of Dr Edgar's acquittal was equally substantial. The
council found the Waikato Times acted professionally and fairly in its
treatment of what was a sensitive and difficult case for all concerned. The
complaint was not upheld. |