|
Allegations of abuse
by NZ Police |
|
|
peterellis homepage / police allegations / Louise
Nicholas vs John Dewar |
|
|
In a "measured and
intentional way", Rotorua CIB chief John Dewar gave evidence to a
courtroom that led to the 1993 mistrial of a former Murupara policeman
charged with sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl. Again in 1994, at a second trial,
Dewar delivered "without hesitation" inadmissible courtroom
evidence that led to another aborted trial against the same man. That is according to testimony
from District Court Judge Les Atkins, who in 1993 was a defence lawyer. He
entered the witness stand in the High Court at Hamilton yesterday. Dewar, now retired, is on trial
for deliberately suppressing or failing to act on sexual complaints against
police officers Bob Schollum, Clint Rickards and Brad Shipton. He faces another charge of
manipulating the key witness during a police investigation into his evidence
at the two Murupara trials. But two further charges - of
giving inadmissible, hearsay evidence at two trials for the Murupara offences
- were the focus of yesterday's court proceedings. Complainant Louise
Crawford, now Louise Nicholas, was at the time making other damning
allegations against Schollum, Rickards and Shipton. In 1993 and 1994 Mr Atkins was the
defence lawyer for the former Murupara policeman. During questioning yesterday,
Judge Atkins said Dewar had taken the stand in 1993 and given hearsay
evidence of another policeman. The Murupara trial was told by Dewar that the
policeman was willing to tell lies on the accused's behalf. This "planted a seed of
conspiracy" among the accused and his friends that they were willing to
lie, and a retrial was ordered. Judge Atkins said it appeared to
him that Dewar was untroubled by what had occurred. At the second trial in 1994, Dewar
took the stand and told the court about statements given to him by Rickards,
Schollum and Shipton, all of whom had indicated they had had sex with Louise
Nicholas. Again, this was inadmissible
hearsay evidence and a mistrial was declared. Dewar appeared amused by the
proceedings, Judge Atkins said. Later yesterday afternoon, Judge Atkins' wife
Lynne gave evidence. She was in the public gallery during the 1994 trial, and
overheard a conversation between Dewar and Louise Nicholas' family. This was during an adjournment,
after Dewar's comments in the witness stand. Dewar had stated words to the
effect "it was a gamble and mischief making", "at least the
jury will know these things now", and "it won't go for a third
trial". Crown prosecutor Brent Stanaway
asked Mrs Atkins if she could recall his demeanour. "I thought he looked
quite excited and pleased with himself." A third trial was ordered. The
accused was subsequently acquitted and has permanent name suppression. Yesterday defence lawyer Paul
Mabey also cross-examined former police inspector Ray Sutton. Mr Sutton was
the first man to take notes about complaints against Schollum, Rickards and
Shipton. Mr Mabey asked Mr Sutton why he
never questioned Dewar about the ongoing investigation into their colleagues. |
