Allegations of Sexual Abuse


Mt Maunganui Pack Rape Case


2. Trial Week 1  June 2005

 



Dominion Post
June 23 2005

Gang-rape complainant fights back

A woman saying she was gang-raped in Mt Maunganui more than 16 years ago has retaliated at a defence lawyer challenging her recollection.

"I am reliving this event as I sit here," she told Rachael Adams, who represents one of four accused men in the High Court trial at Wellington.

"You have no idea what I am going through right now...I am telling you the way it happened because right now I feel I am right there in the...and I am telling you the truth."

The four, aged 40, 46, 47, and 53, are on trial on charges of detaining her with intent to have sex with her, and raping her in January 1989. Two of them also face two charges of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection, and one faces another rape charge. They have pleaded not guilty.

The woman, now 37, denied willingly having sex with them.

Justice Ron Young has continued suppression of key details, including the accused men's names.

On the trial's third day yesterday, the woman confirmed earlier evidence that she made a plea with her eyes to Ms Adams' client.

She accepted that the first time she made that claim was in court, despite having already made several statements about the incident.

She said she knew Ms Adams' client had said he did not see what had happened with the other men. She denied adding the "silent plea" evidence to counter his evidence.

She agreed the man had been nervous and she had said words to him such as they had ruined her life and he might as well too. She denied those were words of encouragement. Earlier she described them as desperation.

She said she had just been gang-raped and could not protect herself.

She said her hands were bound during all but the last sexual act, and she was penetrated with an object. She said that on Monday she went back to the hut where the incident happened and could not find anything that her hands would have been bound around.

She asked for a break in the court session after Ms Adams showed her an object the woman agreed had no obvious differences to the one she said was used on her.

Three of the men are expected to give evidence, accepting they had sex with her but saying that she consented, was not restrained and that no object was used.