Allegations of Sexual Abuse


Mt Maunganui Pack Rape Case


2. Trial Week 1  June 2005

 



Stuff
June 23 2005

Former colleague describes woman's behaviour after alleged rape
NZPA

A woman who claims she was pack raped at Mount Maunganui 16 years ago hid from her attackers and acted out of character after the alleged assaults, a former colleague told the High Court at Wellington today.

The two women were working at Mount Maunganui for a Hamilton-based company in the summer of 1989.

The woman, then aged 20, has alleged she was gang-raped by five men in January 1989 after being lured into an empty building on the promise of a date with a man she believed she shared a mutual attraction with.

Four of those men are now charged with rape and abduction. The fifth man has never been identified. The accused men - whose identities are suppressed by the court - admit they had group sex with the woman but say it was consensual.

The former colleague told the court today the two women met the men through their work at Mount Maunganui.

The alleged victim had won a bet with one of the men and her reward was he would set up a lunch date with the man she liked.

However, after she returned from the lunch date the woman's behaviour had changed, the former colleague said. She was no longer bubbly and friendly.

"There were no jokes ... there was no chattiness.

"She was not her usual self, she seemed withdrawn, she didn't seem happy."

The two women got on as colleague but weren't close friends, she said.

"We didn't have the kind of relationship that I would ... say 'what's wrong?'. She kept her private life to herself."

Two of the men had regularly visited the woman at work before the lunch date, she said.

Afterwards they only visited on a couple of occasions.

On one occasion both women had been at work when the men arrived but her colleague indicated that she did not want to see them.

"I went outside and told (them) she wasn't there."

The man the woman had liked had visited the motel the woman was staying in over the summer a day or two after the lunch date.

"She made an excuse and went into the bedroom or toilet. It was not how she would normally act."

Shortly after the lunch date the woman had taken off unexpectedly, not returning for several days.

"I would say it was out of character. I was surprised. I thought she must have had a good reason to leave abruptly".

The woman alleges over a period of an hour-and-a-half she was restrained, raped, forced to perform oral sex and brutally violated by one man with his fingers and another with a large object. Details of that object are also suppressed