Allegations of Sexual Abuse


Mt Maunganui Pack Rape Case


3. Trial Week 2  June 2005

 




Otago Daily Times
June 29 2005

Man accused of rape and abduction says complainant a liar
NZPA

Wellington: A man accused of gang-rape at Mt Maunganui 16 years ago told the High Court at Wellington yesterday the alleged victim is a liar and he will go to his grave knowing he is innocent.

The 53-year-old is the first of four men accused of raping a 20-year-old woman in January 1989 to give evidence. He has pleaded not guilty to charges of rape, abduction, and two counts of unlawful sexual connection.

The woman - now 37 and living in Australia - alleges the men lured her into an empty building on the promise of a lunch date with one of the accused, on whom she had a crush. There, she says, she was restrained, raped, forced to perform oral sex, and violated.

The identity of the accused and many elements of the trial are suppressed.

The man told the court yesterday he had accompanied a work colleague to the building with the hope of participating in group sex. The woman had been a willing sexual partner and they had both enjoyed the experience, he said.

Under cross examination by crown prosecutor Mark Zarifeh, the man admitted there was a “startling difference” between the two accounts.

“She’s lying,” the man said. “She know’s she’s lying. I know she’s lying. I know what I saw.”

The man questioned the woman’s claims he ejaculated on her stomach. “This was consensual group sex. She would have been on the pill, so why would I have?”

However, he admitted he could not remember ejaculating inside her.

No condoms were used and the woman had not seemed concerned about the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, he said.

Police began investigating the incident after the woman lodged a formal complaint in April last year.

When the man and his colleague discovered they were under investigation, there had been a “flurry of contact” between them, Mr Zarifeh said.

The complainant said he and the other man knew their phone calls might be intercepted by police.

“We thought it was best to meet in person so we could discuss her lies and our innocence. “We were under pressure. We needed each other’s support.” The pair discussed elements of the case, such as how they were going to fund their defence, he said.

“We certainly weren’t going to conspire to get up here and tell lies,” he told the court.

Who was telling lies was the essence of the trial “in a nutshell”, the man told Mr Zarifeh. “I know I will go to my grave knowing we’re innocent, because I know we are.”

The man - who was 36 and separated from his wife in 1989 - said he had never, and could never rape any woman.

“Without sounding arrogant, at that particular time I had no problem with female partners; having sex with them or meeting them.

“I’ve never had to resort to that. I could never rape a woman, and I’ve never needed to.”

Defence lawyer Paul Mabey, QC, called a former male friend of the woman whom she visited after the incident.

The woman told the court last week she had fled Mt Maunganui within days of the alleged gang-rape because she was so upset and felt intimidated seeing the men again.

However, the 64-year-old man - whose name is suppressed to protect the woman’s identity - told the court she had visited him at the end of January, possibly weeks after the incident.

The woman had caught a bus to meet him, as she usually did, and had not urgently hired a rental car, as she had testified, the man said.

The trial continues today before Justice Ronald Young and a jury of four men and eight women.