Allegations of Sexual Abuse in NZ


Dr Hiran Fernando (N.P. Doctor) - Index


Index 3.    Trial: Defence

 




Taranaki Daily News
October 6 2006

Witnesses say doctor caring, trustworthy

THE defence has finished calling witnesses in the trial of a New Plymouth doctor accused of sexual assaults against patients.

Nine witnesses, including patients of the doctor, took the stand at the High Court in New Plymouth yesterday.

They gave character testimonies and said he was trustworthy, caring and a good listener.

Some have been patients of the doctor, who has name suppression, for more than 20 years.

The female witnesses have been to him for cervical smears, pregnancy tests and breast examinations.

They said there was a blanket available to cover themselves during smears and nurses were sometimes present.

None felt the doctor's manner or behaviour had been inappropriate.

"He made you at ease," one woman told the court. "He's very compassionate."

Four of the witnesses had received antenatal and postnatal care from him.

The patients said they had discussed sensitive matters with the doctor and found him to be understanding.

He took the time to listen to people's concerns, even when his waiting room was busy, one woman said.

A male witness said the doctor once visited his home to check on him. The doctor drove him to the hospital because he was concerned about his health and offered to collect him afterwards.

"I think he has an excellent character -- thoroughly honest, thoroughly trustworthy and a man you can depend on."

Defence witness Lynn Bublitz, New Plymouth's deputy mayor, described him as honest and community-minded.

New Plymouth coroner Roger Mori, another defence witness, told the court he had known the doctor for about 25 years and had never had any reason to question his integrity.

"In my opinion, he's always been perfectly honest and forthright."

The doctor denies 37 counts of sexual offending against 12 women patients between 1981 and 2002.

The charges consist of 33 indecent assaults, three of sexual violation and one of indecent assault against a girl aged between 12 and 16.

The Crown alleges the doctor inappropriately touched female patients' genitals, asked them sexually inappropriate questions and carried out unnecessary breast examinations.

The trial, held before Justice Priestley, is expected to resume on Monday with summing up from the Crown and the defence.