Allegations of Sexual Abuse in NZ


Dr Hiran Fernando (N.P. Doctor) - Index


Index 4.    Trial: Verdict

 




Stuff
October 13 2006

Disgraced doctor was investigated in 1980s
NZPA

Dr Hiran Fernando

 

The Medical Council investigated disgraced New Plymouth doctor Hiran Fernando twice in the 1980s for alleged sexual offending, but the complaints were dismissed.

Fernando, 58, was yesterday found guilty in the High Court at New Plymouth on 26 counts of indecently assaulting women between 1981 and 2002.

He faced 34 charges of indecent assault and three of sexual violation against 12 female patients. The charges spanned a 21-year period from 1981.

The jury acquitted him on the three sexual violation charges.

Council chairman Philip Pigou said today Fernando had been the subject of individual complaints to the council by two women in 1984 and 1989.

He told National Radio that it was difficult to give details of the investigations undertaken into the complaints because only scant records of the proceedings remained.

However, the regional committee which looked into the complaints found "that it came down to the problem of one person's opinion against another".

Mr Pigou said he did not have the evidence today needed to assess whether that was a sound decision at the time or not.

"Clearly, in terms of the court convictions yesterday there was a lot more evidence.

"The court was able to hear the evidence of 12 complainants and witnesses and was able to get a much wider picture of this doctor's appalling behaviour."

When Fernando was charged early last year, Mr Pigou said the council immediately reviewed the sort of risk he represented to patients and the public.

He was ordered only to undertake examinations of patients with a chaperone present and was banned from performing any intimate pelvic or breast examinations on women.

Mr Pigou said the council could not guarantee that a chaperone was present for all Fernando's examinations, but that the conditions imposed on him were monitored regularly.

Signs were required to be put up in the waiting and examination areas of the practice telling patients of the need for a chaperone and Fernando was expected to explain to patients the reason why, if asked.

Mr Pigou said the council took the view that Fernando was innocent until proven guilty, and that the measures put in place were sufficient to protect the public.

However, he said the council would be reviewing its handling of the case.

Lorraine Jans, acting manager of Taranaki's SAFER Centre, which offers support and counselling for people who have been sexually abused, said there were many lessons to be learned from the case.

The council did not take the issue of sexual violence seriously enough, she said.

"The council is out of step in looking at where things are in the 21st century.

"They need to have a more robust process around how they deal with allegations of sexual violence."

Ms Jans also believed the use of name suppression needed to be reviewed.

The centre had fielded calls from around the country, wanting to know if the doctor was a man they had seen as a patient.

She said she believed there were many more women who had been abused by Fernando.

"They said they did not want to go ahead and lay complaints but they were totally supporting the women who were going through the court process.

"I really think it was only the tip of the iceberg."