Allegations of Sexual Abuse in NZ

False Allegations - Index

Cases - 2006




Stuff
May 24 2006

Internet dating accuser just a 'drama queen' - defence
NZPA

A woman who says she was sexually violated by a man she met through Internet dating is a "drama queen" who made up the allegations to get attention, the accused man's lawyer says.

The 44-year-old man, who has interim name suppression, is on trial at Wellington District Court on three charges of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection.

He met the complainant – a professional woman in her 40s – through NZDating.com, an Internet dating website on which both had set up profiles.

The Crown case is that the offending happened at the woman's suburban Tawa home on a Sunday morning last May, during the pair's first face-to-face meeting.

The complainant said after telling the man she preferred to meet people in a cafe or public place first, she gave him her home address after he repeatedly assured her he could be trusted.

The Crown says shortly after he arrived at her house he pushed her down on a couch and sexually violated her in three different ways.

She laid a complaint with police the following day.

But in cross-examination of the complainant yesterday defence lawyer Mike Antunovic suggested she had made up the complaints to get attention.

He said the accused had every reason to believe the woman was consenting. She had given him the impression she wanted to have sex, and had engaged in phone sex the day before. She could have told him to leave immediately but did not, did not resist him or tell him to stop until the very end, when he did.

He said her claims were "rubbish" and she was making things up as she went along.

"You're being a drama queen about all this."

He said she was embellishing what happened to try to get attention from other people, who then put pressure on her to go to the police.

But the complainant said it was her decision to go to police. She said she had not consented to sex that day, but considered it was something that could evolve later.

She said she talked about sex in emails with the accused, and others, as part of "light-hearted banter", as was common among users of the website.

She went along with phone sex with the accused, without actively participating, as she had been on her own a long time and wanted to meet someone for a long-term relationship.

Mr Antunovic said if she was as upset by the events as she claimed she would not have spent the rest of the day emailing people, meeting friends for coffee and going to the movies, just like "a normal old Sunday."

But the complainant said she wanted to put it out of her mind and reassure herself not all men in the world were like the accused.

"It was anything but a normal Sunday," she said.

On a police interview video played to the court the accused denied forcing himself on the woman in any way and said she was enjoying it.

He said he had made it clear to her that day that he was only interested in sex and nothing more.

"She was keen as," he said.

He said when later she told him things didn't feel right and it wasn't what she wanted, he stopped and left, after telling her she was a bit mean and unfair.

He said shortly before stopping he had an idea in the back of his mind she might not want to continue.

He said the activity was consensual and she showed no animosity to him afterwards.

The Crown and defence will make closing addresses tomorrow before Judge Chris Tuohy sums up the case and the jury retires to consider its verdicts.