Allegations of Sexual Abuse in NZ

False Allegations - Index

Cases - 2006




Manawatu Standard
June 15 2006

Accused 'misread signals'
by Michael Cummings

A man accused of raping a woman he met on the internet told police he "may have misread some signals", a jury at the Palmerston North District Court heard yesterday.

A 31-year-old Wellington man is on trial for the alleged rape and sexual violation of a 27-year-old Palmerston North woman. The man's name and occupation are suppressed.

The pair met on NZDating.com at the beginning of June last year and met at the woman's Palmerston North home on the night of June 9.

They talked in the lounge for about 40 minutes and the man met the woman's sister and flatmate before they went to her bedroom.

They spent an hour-and-a-half alone in the room, during which time the woman claims the man raped her. She told the court she was not restrained, did not call out for help and "gave in" to the man's demands.

Soon after leaving later that night, the man sent her a text message that read: "I feel bad, sorry for raping you."

In a video interview with Palmerston North Detective Jonathan Oram, the accused said the text message was "a bad choice of words".

He told Det Oram they kissed and had consensual sex, which ended when she said she felt uncomfortable because she had feelings for another man.

"Christ, I did not rape her. What I could possibly say here was I may have misread some signals from her. But if she really felt I was raping her, she had her friend and her sister in the house, she could have screamed out for help."

The accused said in the interview the text message referring to rape was related to earlier conversations they had on the internet.

"It was a bad text message to send. It wasn't like I was gloating I'd raped her.

"When I was driving home I was aware that she was uncomfortable and I just didn't want her to feel uncomfortable."

He told Det Oram he "sometimes uses the wrong word".

"When you use that term, it appears you've had time to think about what you've done and you've thought, I've gone too far."

The man insisted he did not rape the woman.

"I did not have any intention of raping her. Rape is a strong word."

"It's the word you used in the text message you sent her apologising for raping her," Det Oram said.

Earlier in the day, the doctor who examined the woman the night she was allegedly raped told the court the complainant suffered a small internal tear "more consistent with non-consensual than consensual sex".

Katrina Harper said the injury was recent.

Dr Harper told the court 10 to 30 percent of rape victims suffer visible genital injuries.

The jury has heard the correspondence between the accused and the woman leading up to the June 9 meeting was sexually explicit.

The accused emailed the woman after reading her profile on the internet dating site. The woman's profile said she was "looking for a bed buddy".

The man emailed the woman nude pictures of himself, but the woman told the court she made it clear she just wanted a "coffee and a chat" when he visited.

The Crown closed its case yesterday afternoon and the jury was expected to be sent out to consider its verdict today or tomorrow morning.