Allegations
of Sexual Abuse |
|
People were sitting on
the floor and the press were moved to the dock as supporters of a Kapiti
teacher packed a Palmerston North court room for the final day of his
indecent assault trial. The district court jury
in Michael Warren Neville's trial retired at 3.15pm yesterday to consider its
verdict. It retired to a hotel shortly before 10pm and will resume its
deliberations this morning. Neville, 48, has
pleaded not guilty to four charges of indecent assault on girls under 12. The
offences were said to have happened between January 1999 and August 2003. The
complainants were four of his former students. The small court room
was packed yesterday for the closing addresses by counsel and the summing up
by Judge Les Atkins QC. Defence lawyer Bruce
Squire QC said the Crown's case was based on the uncorroborated evidence of
four complainants. The first complainant had said during her evidence that
her best friend had witnessed the offence, but the Crown had not called the
friend as a witness. Crown lawyer Ben
Vanderkolk accused some of the defence witnesses of a cynical attitude
concerning allegations of dishonesty and lying against two of the complainants.
Incidents treated lightly at school assumed major importance during the
trial. Judge Atkins told the
jury that, to constitute an assault, touching had to be deliberate or
intentional. "The second thing to consider is whether the assault was an
indecent one and that is for you alone to decide." An offender would have
to know that what was being done was indecent and, with that knowledge,
continue, Judge Atkins said. The courtroom was so
crowded yesterday that people sat on the floor in front of the first row of
seats in the public gallery and the overflow from the press bench was allowed
to sit in the dock. Throughout the trial,
which was in its eighth day yesterday, Neville, in a dark suit, sat staring
straight ahead, hands clasped in his lap. Two hours after
retiring, the jury returned to have read to them the cross-examination of the
first of the four complainants. |