Allegations of Sexual Abuse


Mt Maunganui Pack Rape Case


4. Verdict  July 2005

 




The Dominion Post
July 5 2005

Pack rape jury out

Jurors considering the fate of four men charged with pack-raping a woman at Mt Maunganui 16 years ago have been told to avoid making a moral judgment.

The men say the woman was a willing partner in a group-sex session.

Justice Ron Young told the jury in the High Court at Wellington that they were not in a court of morals.

The jury retired to consider its verdicts at noon yesterday. At 9.30pm, it retired to a hotel for the night.

Four men, aged 40, 46, 47 and 53, are charged with abduction and rape. One faces an extra rape charge, and he and another of the accused face two extra charges of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection.

The men have pleaded not guilty.

Key details in the trial have been suppressed.

The woman, now 37, said that in January 1989 she was lured to a beach hut on the pretext of having lunch with one of the men and was raped there. The men say she sought sex and was a willing partner.

Summing up, Justice Young said credibility and the reliability of witnesses were at the heart of the case.

If the jury believed, or thought reasonably possible, the men's evidence in court and statements the men gave police earlier, then the accused should be acquitted.

If not, jurists had to decide if they believed the woman's evidence, and whether it proved the legal ingredients of the charges.

Just because the events happened 16 years ago was no reason not to give it the same consideration as if it happened yesterday, Justice Young said.

The lawyer for the youngest accused, Rachael Adams, said the woman had lied to the jury. She said the evidence of the woman and the accused could not be reconciled and were not the result of a misunderstanding.

The woman relished and needed centre stage and in giving evidence she achieved celebrity status, Ms Adams said.

She showed none of the genuine distress that would be expected of a rape victim reliving the trauma.

In contrast, the accused showed no sophistication or pretence giving evidence, Ms Adams said.

The other lawyers gave their final addresses last week.