Allegations of Abuse in NZ

peterellis Home / abuse allegations / Peter Stewart

page 1   Peter Stewart -Trial & Naming    >> page 2

 

This page last updated December2 2008







Dec 19 2007 - Guilty man revealed as Peter Stewart
Name suppression lifted. The man was revealed as Peter Stewart, husband of NZ Fashion Week founder Pieter Stewart and son of the recently deceased Sir Robertson Stewart, who founded one of New Zealand's leading electrical companies, PDL Industries. He will be sentenced in February.

2007-1219 - The Press - 'Prominent' man convicted of rape named

2007-1219 - The Press - Who is Peter Maxwell Stewart?

2007-1219 - Three News - 'Prominent businessman' sex offender named

2007-1219 - Radio NZ - Name suppression bid dropped







Dec 17-18 2007 - Name Suppression and sentencing issues
Concerns about continued name suppression; and date for sentencing

2007-1217 - The Press - Why hide identity?

2007-1218 - The Press - Delay for sex penalty





Dec 8 2007; The Press summarises the case
Martin Van Beynen, of The Press summarises the case: A girl’s sex fantasies or an adult exploiting her. The judge had said something similarly when he said either the accused or the complainant was lying.

Her story: The accused had persuaded her to masturbate him and perform oral sex on him from when she was eight years old. "It was fun," She was young and didn't know any better. By the time she was 13, the indecencies had progressed to intercourse, the first act occurring on a picnic table while she was dressed in her school uniform. Over the years the sex continued, the accused taking opportunities where he could.. She never fought, struggled or cried because he was a father figure. The offending stopped when she started going out with other men.

Witnesses gave evidence of what the complainant had told them about her sex life 30 to 35 years ago, when she was still a schoolgirl. The complainant regaled them with accounts of her sexual escapades with the accused. Several spoke of the complainant's infatuation with the accused,

His story: He had one act of sexual intercourse with the complainant that occurred when she was 17. The complainant was infatuated with him and possessed an over-active imagination; she had fabricated a fantasy sex life with him and found she got rapt attention from her school buddies. The fantasies were then repackaged in adulthood to pressure the accused into financing a lifestyle that she had failed to achieve with her own efforts. The allegations were "fuelled by envy and motivated by money"

2007-1208 - The Press - Guilty man's identity hidden

2007-1208 - The Press - A girl's sex fantasies or an adult exploiting her - the jury's choice




Dec 7 2007; Guilty Verdict
Jury found the man guilty on seven charges of child sexual abuse. It found the man guilty on two charges of inducing a girl under 12 to do an indecent act, three counts of indecent assault, one of sodomy, and one of rape. The man appeared shaken in the dock as the jury returned its verdicts 28 hours after it was sent out to consider the charges.

2007-1207 - The Press - Canty man found guilty on sex charges

2007-1207 - Three News - Prominent Canterbury man found guilty of sex charges

2007-1207 - One News - Man guilty of historic sex charges

2007-1207 - NZ Herald - Prominent Canterbury man guilty of historic sex charges





Dec 6 2007; Judge sums up
The judge, Justice Graham Pankhurst told the jury it would have to confront the total conflict between the complainant and the accused. "There is no halfway house," he said. "Someone is lying." On the one hand, the complainant alleged unremitting abuse over a 10-year period, while the accused said he had sex only once with the complainant, when she was 17

The defence argued the complainant had fantasised about a sexual relationship with the accused and had dredged up the fantasy four years ago to try to extract a house from the accused, the judge said.  According to the defence, her evidence was "hopeless", so short of detail and context as to be dangerous

The Crown maintained the complainant had essentially told the truth, although accepted detail was deficient and inconsistent. The Crown argued that accounts from four witnesses, to whom the complainant, then still a schoolgirl, had talked of sexual activity with the accused, were confirmatory of the allegations. Two of the witnesses had spoken of inappropriate activity by the accused towards them and this could be viewed as the accused having a propensity to act in that way to girls of this age.

2007-1207 - The Press - High Court jury considers historical sex charges

2007-1207 - The Nelson Mail - Sex charges pondered





Dec 5 - Dec 6 2007; Closing addresses


 Defence Lawyer Jonathan Eaton

Defence counsel Jonathan Eaton suggested that the case was "Fuelled by fantasy, ignited by envy, motivated by money”  He said that as a young schoolgirl, the complainant found she could always get a reaction by chattering about her fantasy of having sexual activity with the accused. Then in 2004 she was down on her luck and, envious of the accused's wife, the fantasy was repackaged as rape and paedophilia and "boy does that get a reaction". As she faced consistent denials from his client, she counterpunched with more allegations to put more pressure on his client and to bolster her push for money.   Eaton said the jury would have to feel very uncomfortable about the reliability of the complainant's testimony, which was riddled with inconsistencies and outrageous allegations

Crown counsel Philip Shamy said she had gained nothing from making the allegations other than four days in the witness box having her life raked over. If she was making false accusations she could not have picked worse locations for her fabrications and she would have made sure "to get it right" rather than give her sometimes inconsistent accounts.

2007-1206 - The Press - Sex charges





Dec 3 - Dec 4 2007; Defence case opens.
Three of the 15 charges were dismissed, and others amended.

Opening the defence case lawyer Jonathan Eaton said the complainant's allegations were "quite bizarre" and "inherently unlikely". She had been hopelessly inconsistent and seemed to think all she needed to do was allege sex happened and the rest did not matter, he said. Where records existed, they tended to show the complainant's memories were unreliable. His client had a close relationship with the complainant and she had a bit of a crush on him. When she was 16 or 17, one act of consensual intercourse had occurred, and it was probably the worst mistake of his client's life.

The defendant took the stand denying that any of the events that resulted in charges had occurred. "Absolutely not," he said, when the events were put to him. On at least three occasions, the complainant had connected alleged incidents of sexual abuse with vehicles that he did not own at the time

He admitted admits having sex with the complainant on one occasion when she was 17. "She was horsing around and she had on a brief white bikini," "She had a crush on me and she made overtures to me and at that point I made the biggest mistake of my life and we had sex”

The complainant later made the allegations against him, and asked for a house, and school fees for her son as compensation

2007-1204 - The Press - Charges in sex-abuse case altered

2007-1205 - The Press - sex with teen ‘bad news’ for businessman





Nov 30 - Dec 3 2007 - Prosecution witnesses
Another woman told the court she believed the defendant had touched her inappropriately. She described how the man would touch her in the crotch area when they were driving in a truck, using gear changes as an excuse. Questioned by Eaton, she said she did not believe it was an accident.

Leigh Steele, a school friend of the complainant told of the complainant talking about sexual episodes with the accused. “I believe she was infatuated” she said.

2007-1201 - The Press - Second woman testifies in abuse trial

2007-1204 - The Press - Charges in sex-abuse case altered





November 27 2007 - Complainant gives evidence
The complainant said she had been virtually deaf since she contracted rubella as an infant. A cochlea implant in 1997 had given her 50 per cent hearing in her right ear.  The alleged offending happened at the woman’s family hotel in Christchurch. She told the court how she saw the defendant as a father figure, and felt trapped after he told her the truth would destroy her family. She thought no one would believe her because everyone thought she was “deaf and dumb''. “It was so hard. He had this power over me.''

Defence lawyer placed before the jury correspondence from 2004 and 2005 asking for compensation. She said she withdrew, because of allegations that she was only doing it because she wanted a house and money.

She denied the accused man's claim that they had had sex only once at a named location when she was 16 or 17, at a time when she was infatuated with him and had initiated the contact.

2007-1127 - Newstalk ZB - Father figure on abuse charges

2007-1201 - The Press - Second woman testifies in abuse trial





November 27 2007 - Trial Opening Addresses
As the trial started, the man now faces eight counts of rape, one of sodomy, three of indecent assault and three of inducing an indecent act.

Prosecutor Philip Shamy said the abuse started when the complainant was about 7. Indecent assaults progressed to rape when the complainant was about 13. Years after the abuse ended, the accused visited the woman at her Christchurch workplace in 2003 and suggested they have sex in the back of the shop, which was “the catalyst” to make the complaint.

Defence Lawyer Jonathan Eaton said the accused “clearly and simply'' denied any sexual offending involving the woman “all those years ago''. “What she says [happened] could not have and did not occur.'' However, Mr Eaton said his client admitted having consensual sexual intercourse “on one single occasion'' when the woman was “of age'' - about 16 or 17. He said the complainant's credibility was at issue.

2007-1126 - Newstalk ZB - Man on trial on historical sex abuse charges

2007-1127 - NZ Herald - Visit from accused leads to sex charges





March 6 2007 - Committed to High Court for trial
Judge ruled that the accused be committed for trial. The man faces charges of sexual violation, two of indecent assault on a girl aged under 12, one of indecent assault on the same girl aged 12 to 16, and three charges of raping the girl when she was aged 12 to 16.

2007-0306 - Otago Daily Times - For trial on sex charges





January 29 2007 - Prominent man accused of indecent assault and rape
A prominent Canterbury man, aged 61, is accused of historical allegations dating back almost 40 years. The accusations include indecent assault and rape

Little can be published as a result of extensive suppression rules, including the man’s name.

At the depositions hearing the court heard evidence from four Crown witnesses and two others provided written evidence. The witnesses were childhood friends of the accuser who were asked about their recollections at the time. Two girlfriends had the impression the complainant was in love or infatuated with the defendant. 

2007-0129 - Stuff - Historic child sex allegations at hearing

2007-0129 - Radio NZ - Extensive suppressions cover prominent man's case

2007-0129 - Radio NZ - Prominent Canterbury man accused of sex charges

2007-0129 - Radio NZ - Childhood friend testifies

2007-0130 - The Press - 'Prominent' man accused of rape

2007-0130 - NZ Herald - Wide suppression in child-abuse case

2007-0130 - Waikato Times - Historic child sex charges

2007-0204 - National Business Review - High profile name in court on sex charges